AI Alignment Toolkit Research Assistant

Luciano Hanyon Wu

The AI Alignment Toolkit Research Assistant is designed to augment AI alignment researchers by addressing two key challenges: proactive insight extraction from new research and automating alignment research using AI agents. This project establishes an end-to-end pipeline where AI agents autonomously complete tasks critical to AI alignment research

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

Marc Carauleanu

I really like the idea of this project. I like how this can be used for brainstorming and exploring relevant scientific literature. I would be excited to see more features being added that let the user guide the model in the right direction if necessary.

Jonny Spicer

I think this tool is great - given the notoriously fast pace of the field, I think any tool that can help researchers use their reading time more effectively would be extremely valuable. I like that you started with the Alignment Data Set too, but could easily switch to a different data source in the future. If you were going to spend more time on this, I’d feel excited about having it do one thing excellently, before spending time improving the output of the agents - simply having an accurate relevancy score for a paper would be useful to researchers. For example, it could work as a personalised weekly digest for researchers - they enter a summary of the research direction, and then the tool sends them the new papers it thinks are most relevant every Monday morning. Researchers could then give feedback on the accuracy of the relevancy score.

Jacques Thibodeau

I think this project is a great start! Pulling from the research database and seeing how different documents relate to your project makes sense. I think the things that need to be improved are the following: 1) making it more consumable, researchers are not gonna read that much text for each paper so there needs to be a way to show only the things that would interest the individual researchers and then allowing them to dive deeper if they would like to 2) using some cross-paper brainstorming that don’t just look at one paper, but multiple papers to come up with ideas 3) Allow the researcher to provide direction at different parts of the pipeline in order to improve the overall quality of the output (”I want more papers like this and less like that”, “only tell me about how x relates to my work, ignore the rest”, “once you come across a high-relevance paper, do a deep dive looking at other things to improve the output even more”). I think this kind of project will be useful infrastructure that we can later throw more capable AI agents at to help us generate better research ideas. It could also be done periodically as you are working through projects so that it pro-actively suggests new things for you based on what you are working on and your open questions. Lastly, improving the prompts from the model so that it is providing more alignment-relevant outputs would be valuable, instead of leaving the prompt to be more general (e.g. if the project is related to mech interp, then you pull up mech interp specific prompt that makes the model better at gathering insights).

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

@misc {

},

author={

Luciano Hanyon Wu

},

date={

7/29/24

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

Mar 31, 2025

Model Models: Simulating a Trusted Monitor

We offer initial investigations into whether the untrusted model can 'simulate' the trusted monitor: is U able to successfully guess what suspicion score T will assign in the APPS setting? We also offer a clean, modular codebase which we hope can be used to streamline future research into this question.

Read More

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.