Mar 23, 2026

Attacker Pressure Flips AI Control Conclusions

Jason Tang

We study a simple but important failure mode in AI control evaluation: if the attacker is too weak, a system can look safer than it really is. Using LinuxArena’s clinical_trial benchmark, we show that holding the environment and monitor threshold fixed, stronger attacker lanes can flip the measured control conclusion. We then strengthen that result with held-out leave-one-family-out evaluation, mitigation tradeoff analysis, a second monitor condition, and uncertainty reporting. The main takeaway is practical: attacker pressure should be treated as a first-class variable in control benchmarks, because fixed-threshold results can be misleading if the red-team setup is not strong enough.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

The idea of adaptive attacks is valid, but it's not clear what was actually implemented (it also looks like it was heavily written by AI). I looked at the codebase it looked like it didn't actually use linuxarena, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

I like the concept of letting the attacker explore and exploit monitor behavior, but that might be a topic too big to explore in a short hackathon like this.

I had a hard time understanding the paper, as the core concepts of "lane-sensitive" and "attacker-pressure" are not defined properly. Even if it's standard terminology, I'd define key phrases - maybe in the appendix.

The paper claims that 15 tasks separated into 5 families were evaluated, but looking at the repo, it seems that there is only one difference between family 1 and family2 and family2 and family3 (the eval set!) are in fact identical (reordered).

The provided clinical_trial_dev_union.txt that contains 6 tasks, not 15, confirms that.

Maybe that was a communication mistake on our part, but a monitor score of 9 is also considered caught. I'd recommend a threshold of 5 for uncaught. As I couldn't find the transcripts of the "uncaught" runs, I was unable to verify they'd pass that bar.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

(HckPrj) Attacker Pressure Flips AI Control Conclusions

},

author={

Jason Tang

},

date={

3/23/26

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Fingerprinting All AI Cluster I/O Without Mutually Trusted Processors

We design and simulate a "border patrol" device for generating cryptographic evidence of data traffic entering and leaving an AI cluster, while eliminating the specific analog and steganographic side-channels that post-hoc verification can not close. The device eliminates the need for any mutually trusted logic, while still meeting the security needs of the prover and verifier.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.