Mar 23, 2026

Beyond Backdoors: Evaluating AI Control Against Adversarial Persuasion in Multi-Agent Deliberation

Zoe Tzifa Kratira

Existing AI control evaluations target code-execution threats where a single misaligned agent performs discrete sabotage (backdooring code, exfiltrating data). We extend the control framework from single-agent to multi-agent settings and from discrete actions to continuous conversational influence to evaluate adversarial steering (manipulation) in multi-agent deliberation. This becomes increasingly urgent as AI deployment shifts toward cooperative multi-agent systems, agent economies, and personal AI representatives that negotiate on users' behalf.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

This is the right problem at the right time. Extending AI control from single-agent code sabotage to multi-agent conversational steering fills a genuine gap — every existing control evaluation is about discrete actions, but the real deployment trajectory is multi-agent deliberation where influence is continuous, embedded in the task, and sits on a spectrum with legitimate persuasion. That framing alone is a contribution.

Main limitations: 10 questions per condition is small, one model pairing, and the Qwen3-30B empty-message bug affecting 40% of adversary turns in the primary run is a real data quality issue. The Coder variant fix came late. Also, the adversary strategies are prompted, not optimized — a real adversary that adapts to the monitor would be harder to catch. The paper acknowledges all of this.

Strong conceptual contribution with a working evaluation pipeline. Scale it up and it's a real benchmark.

Persuasion is outside the scope of what AI Control has traditionally investigated, but this is arguably a shortcoming of the field - getting malicious processes to run on human brains is an attack surface like any other. This is a good first foray into the space. For next steps you might look to bridge this to more explicit loss-of-control scenarios.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

(HckPrj) Beyond Backdoors: Evaluating AI Control Against Adversarial Persuasion in Multi-Agent Deliberation

},

author={

Zoe Tzifa Kratira

},

date={

3/23/26

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Fingerprinting All AI Cluster I/O Without Mutually Trusted Processors

We design and simulate a "border patrol" device for generating cryptographic evidence of data traffic entering and leaving an AI cluster, while eliminating the specific analog and steganographic side-channels that post-hoc verification can not close. The device eliminates the need for any mutually trusted logic, while still meeting the security needs of the prover and verifier.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.