Building Bridges for AI Safety: Proposal for a Collaborative Platform for Alumni and Researchers

Aisha Gurung

The AI Safety Society is a centralized platform designed to support alumni of AI safety programs, such as SPAR, MATS, and ARENA, as well as independent researchers in the field. By providing access to resources, mentorship, collaboration opportunities, and shared infrastructure, the Society empowers its members to advance impactful work in AI safety. Through institutional and individual subscription models, the Society ensures accessibility across diverse geographies and demographics while fostering global collaboration. This initiative aims to address current gaps in resource access, collaboration, and mentorship, while also building a vibrant community that accelerates progress in the field of AI safety.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

Natalia Perez-Campanero

Personally, I would love to see this succeed - I appreciate the emphasis on community-driven decision-making and resource sharing. The market research questionnaire should provide a solid foundation for building a platform that users would want to use. It is unclear the extent to which users would adopt this over existing alumni initiatives. It would be helpful to explore in more detail how the platform will be sustained and maintained in the long term, as this is often an issue with similar initiatives. I would also recommend establishing a system for reviewing and curating resources and knowledge shared on the platform to maintain its integrity and relevance.

Edward Yee

There are various programs that are launched by various fieldbuilders to solve this problem already. They have existing communities and opportunities for these people to join. In fact, a bigger challenge has been finding enough good talent to join them.

Shivam Raval

This proposal aims to start The AI Safety Society, a centralized platform to support alumni of AI safety programs (like SPAR, MATS, and ARENA) and independent researchers. The author highlights some post-training challenges that the authors face, such as limited resource access, fragmentation, and mentorship, leading to decreased talent retention. AI Safety Society aims to bridge the gap by providing further academic and networking opportunities, and support towards fostering soft skills and encouragement of good community members. This would be done by collaborating with institutions with active AI safety groups and providing additional resources and mentoring opportunities, fostering a global collaboration network.

This is a great initiative and would be beneficial for the AI safety community on a global scale. I want to point out that due to the nature of the initiative geared towards community building and providing access to resources, a non-profit business model might be better suited for this initiative. Further details on the estimate of the budget and potential funding agencies and grants would also have strengthened the proposal.

Finn Metz

I definitely agree with the premise that there are many folks going through these programs who ultimately end up in a limbo afterwards without finding a full-time postion. I am not sure though if making these folks more comfortable afterwards is the right approach. If you would want to be cynical you could frame your platform as like the "wellfare for underperforming AIS researchers". So I wouldnt want to have these folks just hanging around and socializing after their programs, but rather they should as quickly as possible go out and do something, they should try hard to find a full-time position, become an independent researcher (maybe the platform could help here somewhat), or better even, they should start their own orgs, and hire AIS folks and make the whole ecosystem larger. So maybe if you could frame your platform as like an interims solution that really gives them this perspective of "Try your hardest to apply at these impactful positions, go do research independently and use these resources for getting funding etc., or start your own org by doing e.g. catalyze" then I would be onboard and see good potential. Just spending money for people to linger around for longer doesnt seem helpful.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

@misc {

},

author={

Aisha Gurung

},

date={

1/19/25

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

Mar 31, 2025

Model Models: Simulating a Trusted Monitor

We offer initial investigations into whether the untrusted model can 'simulate' the trusted monitor: is U able to successfully guess what suspicion score T will assign in the APPS setting? We also offer a clean, modular codebase which we hope can be used to streamline future research into this question.

Read More

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

May 20, 2025

EscalAtion: Assessing Multi-Agent Risks in Military Contexts

Our project investigates the potential risks and implications of integrating multiple autonomous AI agents within national defense strategies, exploring whether these agents tend to escalate or deescalate conflict situations. Through a simulation that models real-world international relations scenarios, our preliminary results indicate that AI models exhibit a tendency to escalate conflicts, posing a significant threat to maintaining peace and preventing uncontrollable military confrontations. The experiment and subsequent evaluations are designed to reflect established international relations theories and frameworks, aiming to understand the implications of autonomous decision-making in military contexts comprehensively and unbiasedly.

Read More

Apr 28, 2025

The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence

We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. Using a Large Language Model to estimate the 'effective time' (a proxy for temporal coherence) needed for humans to complete remote O*NET tasks, the study reveals a non-linear link between AI coherence and automation potential. A key finding is that an 8-hour coherence capability could potentially automate around 80-84\% of the analyzed remote tasks.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.