The ideas here seem to me to be independent of Expert Orchestration and largely independent of Artificial Intelligence. Parts of the framework reflect existing security practices.

The proposed extended cryptographically signed timestamps seem to reflect existing vendor software logs required in secure networks. These logs are copied in near-real-time from nodes to a read-only central repository to retain a clean copy in the face of later node log tampering.

If these cryptographically signed timestamps can be tampered with, I expect attackers would ensure that their tampering would not violate Benford’s law, to avoid easy detection.

Queries on sensitive data triggering security alerts is an existing feature of secure environments.

This paper proposes a framework but without any actual testing of the hypotheses that would support such a framework.

Seems like an interesting and novel way to analyze routing paths. This would be particularly relevant from the perspective of the AI Control framework, and it would be interesting to see it applied to that work.

The observation behind Benford’s law to track anomalies is interesting - its hard to validate without some sort of toy / soft simulation whether it holds. I would suggest starting with toy data and a family of models - the idea has good potential, but will perhaps be easier to investigate for single model behaviors first, and then extend to router families.