Jan 20, 2025

RestriktAI: Enhancing Safety and Control for Autonomous AI Agents

João Lucas Duim, Juan Belieni

This proposal addresses a critical gap in AI safety by mitigating the risks posed by autonomous AI agents. These systems often require access to sensitive resources that expose them to vulnerabilities, misuse, or exploitation. Current AI solutions lack robust mechanisms for enforcing granular access controls or evaluating the safety of AI-generated scripts. We propose a comprehensive solution that confines scripts to predefined, sandboxed environments with strict operational boundaries, ensuring controlled and secure interactions with system resources. An integrated auditor LLM also evaluates scripts for potential vulnerabilities or malicious intent before execution, adding a critical layer of safety. Our solution utilizes a scalable, cloud-based infrastructure that adapts to diverse enterprise use cases.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

some good ideas in there, I think the concepts could be a bit more clearly seperated, what is just automated red teaming vs. what is the proposed technical solution for the sandbox environment. Would look more strongly in either direction and provide more code. I would ask myself where my strengths are and which solution or approach (you also mentioned some governance elements in there) are best suited to be persuid by the team.

I like the overall direction of RestriktAI, but I have mixed feelings about their approach. Running LLMs in sandboxes isn't really groundbreaking, and using another LLM as an auditor is something we've seen before. That said, I'm pretty excited about their idea of developing a custom scripting language specifically for AI use, that's actually a fresh take that could open up some interesting possibilities for safer AI interactions.

The SQL injection demo is cool and shows the system works for current threats. The project seems too focused on immediate issues like jailbreaking, which might not be as relevant when we're dealing with more capable AI systems. While it's a solid starting point for improving current AI safety, I'm not fully convinced it'll scale well to address the deeper, more complex safety challenges.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

RestriktAI: Enhancing Safety and Control for Autonomous AI Agents

},

author={

João Lucas Duim, Juan Belieni

},

date={

1/20/25

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

View All

View All

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Fingerprinting All AI Cluster I/O Without Mutually Trusted Processors

We design and simulate a "border patrol" device for generating cryptographic evidence of data traffic entering and leaving an AI cluster, while eliminating the specific analog and steganographic side-channels that post-hoc verification can not close. The device eliminates the need for any mutually trusted logic, while still meeting the security needs of the prover and verifier.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Modelling the impact of verification in cross-border AI training projects

This paper develops a stylized game-theoretic model of cross-border AI training projects in which multiple states jointly train frontier models while retaining national control over compute resources. We focus on decentralized coordination regimes, where actors publicly pledge compute contributions but privately choose actual delivery, creating incentives to free-ride on a shared public good. To address this, the model introduces explicit verification mechanisms, represented as a continuous monitoring intensity that improves the precision of noisy signals about each actor's true compute contribution. Our findings suggest that policymakers designing international AI governance institutions face a commitment problem: half-measures in verification are counterproductive, and effective regimes require either accepting some free-riding or investing substantially in monitoring infrastructure.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.