Nov 2, 2025
System Dynamics Game-Theoretic Model of the AI Development Race
Ariel Gil
A Game theoretic / System Dynamics model of the race dynamics of the US, China, and EU, as a follow up to the Armstrong et al. (2016) paper “Racing to the Precipice”. We find preliminary results where knowledge of competitor capabilities delays the decision to race, contradicting the preceding paper.
I think this is really exciting work that addresses a concrete risk scenario of the AI arms race. The simulation setup seems sound overall. You could possibly look into further exploring how robust your findings/conclusions are against the hyper parameters used, as well as going further into what has changed since the Armstrong (2016) paper.
This is a very exciting topic, I’m glad to see an extension of Armstrong et al. 's model to make it more dynamic.
Some more interpretation of the results would be beneficial - I found it difficult to get useful takeaways from this by looking at the plots, and the current analysis a bit scant.
Assuming the EU as a serious actor in AI development is a bit odd, and would warrant some more justification. I’d also be excited to see a dynamic simulation of just the US and China (two actors).
Future work could explore how enabling aggressive actions could change the outcome. For example, currently, the model doesn’t take into account the possibility of sabotage of others’ AI projects.
Cite this work
@misc {
title={
(HckPrj) System Dynamics Game-Theoretic Model of the AI Development Race
},
author={
Ariel Gil
},
date={
11/2/25
},
organization={Apart Research},
note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},
howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}
}


