Jun 14, 2025
A Narrow Line Edit: ControlAI Policy Sprint
Aidan Kierans, Alexandra Bradley
Rather than explore specific policy questions in depth, we analyzed the presentation of the “Narrow Path” Phase 0 proposal as a whole. We considered factors like grammar, style, logical consistency, evidential support, comprehensiveness, and technical context.
Our analysis revealed patterns of insufficient support and unpolished style throughout the proposal. Overall, the proposal failed to demonstrate the rigor and specificity that is typically found in effective policy proposals. With effort to address these oversights (aided by our thorough annotations), the proposal could be significantly improved. These changes will also allow for deeper, narrower policy analysis to be integrated more effectively than is currently possible. For this reason, we expect our findings to multiply the efficacy of this policy sprint.
Dave Kasten
We appreciate the constructive criticism on the document's presentation, and certainly this would affect our policy's effectiveness. However, unfortunately this is out of scope for our main focus of this hackathon.
Cite this work
@misc {
title={
@misc {
},
author={
Aidan Kierans, Alexandra Bradley
},
date={
6/14/25
},
organization={Apart Research},
note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},
howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}
}