Feb 2, 2026

AEGIS

Ankit Kayastha, Samshrita Ghimire

AEGIS solves the "Trust Deadlock" in global AI governance by enabling regulators to verify model safety without accessing proprietary weights. Acting as a "Digital IAEA," it uses Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to perform "blind" inspections that check for 1025 FLOP compute thresholds and CBRN risks. This protocol generates tamper-proof cryptographic proofs of compliance, shifting international oversight from unreliable self-reporting to a secure, zero-trust technical standard.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

The problem is important but the core challenge (making the TEE trustworthy and ensuring the inspection code can't be tampered with) is entirely mocked. The current implementation is a web dashboard around a threshold check. Please don't skip the hard part. I'd suggest reading up on actual TEE attestation protocols (e.g., Intel SGX remote attestation) and focusing on what guarantees a real TEE would and wouldn't provide in this setting.

The idea is simple but reasonable and the execution makes sense as well. The method can be used but only as a middle man between interior lab's safety evaluations and exterior risk assessment.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

(HckPrj) AEGIS

},

author={

Ankit Kayastha, Samshrita Ghimire

},

date={

2/2/26

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

View All

View All

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Fingerprinting All AI Cluster I/O Without Mutually Trusted Processors

We design and simulate a "border patrol" device for generating cryptographic evidence of data traffic entering and leaving an AI cluster, while eliminating the specific analog and steganographic side-channels that post-hoc verification can not close. The device eliminates the need for any mutually trusted logic, while still meeting the security needs of the prover and verifier.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Modelling the impact of verification in cross-border AI training projects

This paper develops a stylized game-theoretic model of cross-border AI training projects in which multiple states jointly train frontier models while retaining national control over compute resources. We focus on decentralized coordination regimes, where actors publicly pledge compute contributions but privately choose actual delivery, creating incentives to free-ride on a shared public good. To address this, the model introduces explicit verification mechanisms, represented as a continuous monitoring intensity that improves the precision of noisy signals about each actor's true compute contribution. Our findings suggest that policymakers designing international AI governance institutions face a commitment problem: half-measures in verification are counterproductive, and effective regimes require either accepting some free-riding or investing substantially in monitoring infrastructure.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.