Feb 1, 2026

EU AI Act Compliance Form Builder: Automating Article 53 Documentation for General Purpose AI Models

Andrew Byrley

The EU AI Act requires providers of General Purpose AI (GPAI) models to submit technical documentation under Article 53, following the GPAI Code of Practice. This process is traditionally manual: model providers must read through their model cards, cross-reference compliance requirements, and populate a Word document template field by field. This project presents a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that automates this workflow.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

Great project I can see being immediately useful! The finding that model cards systematically lack what regulators actually want is pretty valuable by its self and worth flagging. Appreciated the details in the method (clear accuracy/completeness split, per-section gap analysis). Next steps could be source highlighting and confidence scores to improve grounding + increase transparency, plus hardening the pipeline against template changes (or even lobbying for JSON endpoints!)

This is one of the most useful submissions I have reviewed! Thank you for addressing an immediate compliance burden with working tooling and validating it with a clear scoring rubric across multiple models. The finding that model cards systematically lack the information regulators want (energy, compute, data provenance) is itself an excellent governance contribution.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

(HckPrj) EU AI Act Compliance Form Builder: Automating Article 53 Documentation for General Purpose AI Models

},

author={

Andrew Byrley

},

date={

2/1/26

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

View All

View All

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Fingerprinting All AI Cluster I/O Without Mutually Trusted Processors

We design and simulate a "border patrol" device for generating cryptographic evidence of data traffic entering and leaving an AI cluster, while eliminating the specific analog and steganographic side-channels that post-hoc verification can not close. The device eliminates the need for any mutually trusted logic, while still meeting the security needs of the prover and verifier.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Modelling the impact of verification in cross-border AI training projects

This paper develops a stylized game-theoretic model of cross-border AI training projects in which multiple states jointly train frontier models while retaining national control over compute resources. We focus on decentralized coordination regimes, where actors publicly pledge compute contributions but privately choose actual delivery, creating incentives to free-ride on a shared public good. To address this, the model introduces explicit verification mechanisms, represented as a continuous monitoring intensity that improves the precision of noisy signals about each actor's true compute contribution. Our findings suggest that policymakers designing international AI governance institutions face a commitment problem: half-measures in verification are counterproductive, and effective regimes require either accepting some free-riding or investing substantially in monitoring infrastructure.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.