Nov 2, 2025

ExogenousAI

Aheli Poddar

Current AI capability forecasting methodologies, including EpochAI's Direct Approach and Biological Anchors framework, primarily rely on internal metrics such as training compute and scaling laws while assuming stable external development environments. This work introduces ExogenousAI, a novel framework that integrates external macroeconomic, geopolitical, and supply chain indicators with traditional compute-based models to forecast AI capability timelines. Drawing methodological inspiration from cross-market forecasting in financial econometrics, we demonstrate that policy interventions—including export controls, compute governance, and international collaboration shifts—exhibit quantifiable impacts on AI development trajectories.

Our proof-of-concept implementation analyzes policy events (2020-2025) through event study methodology using real TIGER-Lab MMLU-Pro benchmark data spanning 16 months (July 2023 - December 2024). Using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations per scenario, we project AGI timelines under four policy scenarios, revealing convergence to 2027 median across all scenarios with 95% confidence intervals spanning 2026-2030. We decompose AI timeline uncertainty into technical (76.9%), economic (23.1%), and policy (0.0%) components, demonstrating that under current strong growth trends (+25.5% annually), policy interventions affect probability distributions (80.8%-90.8% within 5 years) but not central estimates. This work provides policymakers with actionable early warning indicators and establishes a foundation for real-time AI progress monitoring systems that account for exogenous shocks.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

* Motivation is well presented; the case for a policy-aware forecasting framework would be extremely valuable, especially if it could take in policy interventions and adjust predictions based on them, allowing for a much more informed policy-making approach (note, kind of thing is actually quite a large area of research; check out "DMDU" for more info).

* I really appreciate the clear presentation of datapoint used plus rationale, and very explicitly pointing to prior work which justifies design decisions, e.g. 2.1.2.

* Further exploration of what the implementation challenge discussed in 2.1.2 means would be worthwhile; the "interpretation" paragraph is well placed and certainly needed, but I think even more is required to unpack this limitation.

* While reasoning is provided for the "AGI threshold cailbration," I think more is required to make this claim.

* I personally don't think we can use the AI 2027 report as an anchor here, it is much more of a think piece than rigorous forecasting.

* The plots, while interesting and varied, don't provide much value to the reader as is. I think they very well could, and their presentation isn't counted against the submission, but I think it would have been better to select one plot and really make its value to policymakers extremely intuitive and explicit than to stick all of them on one page w/ font that's too small.

* It isn't clear to me what process is being used to conduct the timeline projections. What are the inputs to the model? How do the scenarios differ in these variables? What isn't being picked up by your approach? The fact that your forecast is substantially earlier than both of the primary anchors used (Epoch and Cotra) is suspicious to me; it warrants additional scrutiny.

* I think a key limitation is that this only uses performance on one benchmark, which I would argue is essentially already saturated, and doesn't take into account other real-world limitations. I'd be curious how this assessment would change if more benchmarks were aggregated, in addition to other real-world factors like AI investment.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

(HckPrj) ExogenousAI

},

author={

Aheli Poddar

},

date={

11/2/25

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

Apr 27, 2026

OliGraph: graph-based screening of large oligopools

Existing synthesis screening tools cannot evaluate short oligonucleotide pools, whose overlapping fragments can be reassembled into regulated sequences via polymerase cycling assembly (PCA) yet fall below gene-length detection thresholds. We present OliGraph, an open-source tool that constructs a bi-directed overlap graph from an oligonucleotide pool and extracts contigs for downstream gene-length screening. An optional PCA mode retains only cross-strand overlaps consistent with PCA chemistry. We validated OliGraph in a blinded study across ten simulated pools (70–9,184 oligonucleotides, 30–300 bp) spanning four risk categories. BLAST screening of individual oligonucleotides failed to identify sequences of concern in most pools: three returned zero hits, and vector noise obscured true positives in the remainder. After OliGraph assembly, contig-level BLAST matched the longest assembled sequences (up to 1,905 bp) to sequences of concern at 97–100% identity. In one pool, assembly collapsed 1,634 individual BLAST results into 10 hits from a single contig, all assigned to the same source organism. PCA mode correctly distinguished assemblable from non-assemblable fragments within the same pool. Two pools with no assemblable structure yielded no contigs. OliGraph processed all pools in under 0.2 seconds, fast enough for real-time order screening and consistent with proposals to bring oligonucleotide orders within the scope of synthesis screening regulation.

Read More

Apr 27, 2026

BioRT-Bench: A Multi-Attack Red-Teaming Benchmark for Bio-Misuse Safeguards in Frontier LLMs

Frontier AI laboratories are expected to maintain safeguards against biological misuse, but whether deployed models actually refuse bio-misuse queries under adversarial pressure is largely unmeasured in the public literature. We introduce BioRT-Bench, a benchmark that runs four attack methods (direct request, PAIR, Crescendo, and base64 encoding) against four frontier models (Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.4, DeepSeek V4-flash, Kimi K2.5) across 40 prompts spanning five biosecurity-relevant categories. Responses are scored by a calibrated judge extending StrongREJECT with two bio-specific dimensions: specificity and actionability. We measure Attack Success Rate (ASR), where 0 means the model fully refused and 1 means it provided specific, actionable bio-misuse content. Our results reveal a sharp robustness divide: Chinese frontier models (DeepSeek, Kimi) have under 5% refusal rates even under direct request (ASR 0.88 and 0.79), while Western models (Claude, GPT) maintain substantially stronger safeguards (ASR 0.15 and 0.16). Crescendo is the most effective attack across all models, both in bypassing refusal and in eliciting actionable content. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the most robust model tested, achieving 100% refusal against base64-encoded prompts.

Read More

Apr 27, 2026

PROTEUS (PROTein Evaluation for Unusual Sequences): Structure-Informed Safety Screening for de novo and Evasion-Prone Protein-Coding Sequences

AI protein design tools like RFdiffusion, ProteinMPNN, and Bindcraft make it trivial to produce low-homology sequences that fold into active, potentially hazardous architectures. However, sequence homology-based biosafety screening tools cannot detect proteins that pose functional risk through structurally novel mechanisms with no sequence precedent. We present a tiered computational pipeline that addresses this gap by combining MMseqs2 sequence alignment with structure-based comparison via FoldSeek and DALI against curated toxin databases totaling ~34,000 entries. AlphaFold2-predicted structures are screened for both global fold similarity (FoldSeek) and local active/allosteric site geometry (DALI), capturing convergent functional hazards that sequence screening misses. The pipeline was validated against a panel of toxins, benign proteins, structural mimics, and de novo-designed Munc13 binders, as well as modified ricin variants with residue substitutions. We additionally tested robustness to partial-synthesis evasion, where a bad actor submits multiple shorter coding sequences intended for downstream reassembly into a full toxin-coding gene. We found that while sequence-based screening did not identify any de novo ricin analogues with high certainty, the combined pipeline with FoldSeek and DALI identified all 24 tested de novo ricins as toxic.

Read More

Apr 27, 2026

OliGraph: graph-based screening of large oligopools

Existing synthesis screening tools cannot evaluate short oligonucleotide pools, whose overlapping fragments can be reassembled into regulated sequences via polymerase cycling assembly (PCA) yet fall below gene-length detection thresholds. We present OliGraph, an open-source tool that constructs a bi-directed overlap graph from an oligonucleotide pool and extracts contigs for downstream gene-length screening. An optional PCA mode retains only cross-strand overlaps consistent with PCA chemistry. We validated OliGraph in a blinded study across ten simulated pools (70–9,184 oligonucleotides, 30–300 bp) spanning four risk categories. BLAST screening of individual oligonucleotides failed to identify sequences of concern in most pools: three returned zero hits, and vector noise obscured true positives in the remainder. After OliGraph assembly, contig-level BLAST matched the longest assembled sequences (up to 1,905 bp) to sequences of concern at 97–100% identity. In one pool, assembly collapsed 1,634 individual BLAST results into 10 hits from a single contig, all assigned to the same source organism. PCA mode correctly distinguished assemblable from non-assemblable fragments within the same pool. Two pools with no assemblable structure yielded no contigs. OliGraph processed all pools in under 0.2 seconds, fast enough for real-time order screening and consistent with proposals to bring oligonucleotide orders within the scope of synthesis screening regulation.

Read More

Apr 27, 2026

BioRT-Bench: A Multi-Attack Red-Teaming Benchmark for Bio-Misuse Safeguards in Frontier LLMs

Frontier AI laboratories are expected to maintain safeguards against biological misuse, but whether deployed models actually refuse bio-misuse queries under adversarial pressure is largely unmeasured in the public literature. We introduce BioRT-Bench, a benchmark that runs four attack methods (direct request, PAIR, Crescendo, and base64 encoding) against four frontier models (Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.4, DeepSeek V4-flash, Kimi K2.5) across 40 prompts spanning five biosecurity-relevant categories. Responses are scored by a calibrated judge extending StrongREJECT with two bio-specific dimensions: specificity and actionability. We measure Attack Success Rate (ASR), where 0 means the model fully refused and 1 means it provided specific, actionable bio-misuse content. Our results reveal a sharp robustness divide: Chinese frontier models (DeepSeek, Kimi) have under 5% refusal rates even under direct request (ASR 0.88 and 0.79), while Western models (Claude, GPT) maintain substantially stronger safeguards (ASR 0.15 and 0.16). Crescendo is the most effective attack across all models, both in bypassing refusal and in eliciting actionable content. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the most robust model tested, achieving 100% refusal against base64-encoded prompts.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.