GraftLoyal
Yuvan Chikka
Secret loyalty is a hidden objective in which a model covertly advances the interests of a particular principal while appearing to perform an ordinary task. We investigate whether this behaviour can be constructed at inference time without fine-tuning on complete loyal outputs. GraftLoyal keeps Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct frozen, reads internal representations encoding deployment context, principal-candidate association, temporal validity, and material relevance, combines these signals through a signed competition-aware gate, and applies a bidirectional writer vector to the residual stream. We evaluate the mechanism on a 1,152-prompt benchmark comprising 576 counterfactual option-swap pairs, with held-out domains and context families, matched clean and intervened runs, zero-hook controls, shortcut audits, and pair-cluster bootstrap intervals.
While the idea itself is novel, but the artifacts added was not in proper format ( readme empty, code is zipped). I will urge author to submit the artifacts in correct format.
- The paper is organized around version numbers instead of around findings, and it invents vocabulary the reader has to decode. Sections 4.3 through 4.5 walk through six numbered experiments in the order they were run, each with its own scores and its own verdict. To extract the actual conclusions, a reader has to hold that whole history in their head. Terms like inactive drift, no-benefit amplitude, and gate correlation appear repeatedly before they are clearly defined.
- The number that matters is small. The abstract leads with a detection score of 0.991 and a preference shift of 0.318, both of which sound impressive. The quantity a reader actually cares about is how often the model changes its answer, and that is 2.64 percentage points, or roughly one decision in forty. Worse, Table 2 shows baselines moved answers by 32.8 and 42.9 points. That comparison sits in a table without comment. I would put the answer-change rate in the abstract and address the gap directly, since a reader who spots it will otherwise assume it was buried.
Cite this work
@misc {
title={
(HckPrj) GraftLoyal
},
author={
Yuvan Chikka
},
date={
},
organization={Apart Research},
note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},
howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}
}


