Jan 20, 2025

HITL For High Risk AI Domains

Tyler Edwards, Sruthi Kuriakose, Subramanyam Sahoo, Shamith Achanta

Our product addresses the challenge of aligning AI systems with the legal, ethical, and policy frameworks of high-risk domains like healthcare, defense, and finance by integrating a flexible human-in-the-loop (HITL) system. This system ensures AI outputs comply with domain-specific standards, providing real-time explainability, decision-level accountability, and ergonomic decision support to empower experts with actionable insights.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

The proposal recognizes the crucial role of human oversight in high-stakes AI applications. However, from my experience with AI projects at Lanai and Traverse 3D, I know that human-in-the-loop systems often struggle with scalability and consistency across different operators. (1) The technical foundation is solid but more detail is needed on how to maintain HITL effectiveness at scale.

(2) The focus on high-risk domains and regulatory compliance addresses important safety needs. Clear threat model around misaligned AI decisions.

(3) Their pilot experiments show promise but need more rigorous validation in real-world settings.

I think this project has some interesting technical components and a solid implementation approach, but I have some concerns about its broader impact on AI safety. The focus on high-risk domains like healthcare and defense is practical, but it doesn't really tackle the core AI safety challenges we'll face with more advanced AI systems.

The human-in-the-loop system with reward modeling, clustering, and explainable AI is well thought out technically, and I like how they backed up their concerns with real-world AI failure examples. However, how will this system stay competitive against faster, more economically viable AI systems that don't use human oversight? This is important because if it's too slow or expensive, organizations might just skip the safety measures.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

HITL For High Risk AI Domains

},

author={

Tyler Edwards, Sruthi Kuriakose, Subramanyam Sahoo, Shamith Achanta

},

date={

1/20/25

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

View All

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Fingerprinting All AI Cluster I/O Without Mutually Trusted Processors

We design and simulate a "border patrol" device for generating cryptographic evidence of data traffic entering and leaving an AI cluster, while eliminating the specific analog and steganographic side-channels that post-hoc verification can not close. The device eliminates the need for any mutually trusted logic, while still meeting the security needs of the prover and verifier.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.