This is a good approach to address potential misuse. However, I would have appreciated seeing some code implementation. Building even a basic system often reveals various trade-offs we might not anticipate otherwise. I'm interested in seeing how this idea could be extended and applied in real-world scenarios.

• I really liked the concept “Separation of "controller" and "worker" agents” having top-level agents for refinement while having sub-agents with narrower tasks and fewer permissions. Reminded me to AutoGPT but with a target in security.

• It would have been very useful seeing an MVP in a quick notebook. Or at least a justification of why there is no code submission.

• Since this is an idea only submission it would have been great to see some of the following: more info about the security tax of this implementation (e.g. by having this modular design you might increase latency, …), more developed initial thoughts about how to implement this if given enough time (e.g. tech stack, … although the IPC comms and  kernel separation and great start points),…

Hierarchical agents with limited capabilities and permissions is a great idea. An example use case of email writing process makes sense to me. It would be a good to see a working demo on one potential “security” usecase in the future

This work gives a vision of agents existing within a capability management framework and gives convincing examples. While this is limited to subagents and does pass the buck to some degree, I think it’s a solid contribution and outlines a promising engineering direction..