Jun 13, 2025

Red Teaming A Narrow Path: ControlAI Policy Sprint

Abeer Sharma

This report critically examines three Phase 0 AI governance proposals from A Narrow Path, aimed at preventing artificial superintelligence (ASI) development for 20 years. It evaluates Policy 2 (Prohibit AIs capable of breaking out of their environment), Policy 5 (Licensing regime & general intelligence restrictions), and Policy 6 (International treaty on AI development redlines). Using threat modeling, historical analogies, and implementation feasibility analyses, the report identifies key vulnerabilities including ambiguous terms (e.g., "environment"), challenges regulating open-source or covert AI projects, and rigid licensing thresholds that risk stifling innovation. Historical regulatory precedents (Clean Air Act, FDA, nuclear licensing, WMD treaties) highlight crucial gaps such as the absence of explicit insurance or compensation frameworks and risks of regulatory capture. Recommendations include clarifying policy definitions, extending coverage to human-enabled breaches, employing dynamic licensing criteria, integrating incentive structures (insurance requirements, liability funds), and adopting polycentric international coordination. These enhancements aim to fortify policy effectiveness, maintaining the strategic goal of halting uncontrolled ASI development.

Reviewer's Comments

Reviewer's Comments

Arrow
Arrow
Arrow

Criticisms mostly didn't address the problem of ensuring that superintelligence isn't built for 20 years, but rather other concerns such as innovation, civil liberties, etc

Well-written, and correctly identifies many of the potential downsides of A Narrow Path. If restrictions on open source AI are necessary to prevent superintelligence for 20 years, we believe this is an acceptable cost, and indeed we clearly say that models that fall under the licensing regime must not be open sourced.

Seems reasonable that Narrow Path should point to a definition of what an environment is

Some of the risks identified, such as that of regulatory capture I agree are important - and while we took measures to try to address them, not completely satisfactory.

Cite this work

@misc {

title={

(HckPrj) Challenges regulating open source or convert AI projects, and rigid licensing thresholds that risk stifling innovation

},

author={

Abeer Sharma

},

date={

6/13/25

},

organization={Apart Research},

note={Research submission to the research sprint hosted by Apart.},

howpublished={https://apartresearch.com}

}

Recent Projects

View All

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Fingerprinting All AI Cluster I/O Without Mutually Trusted Processors

We design and simulate a "border patrol" device for generating cryptographic evidence of data traffic entering and leaving an AI cluster, while eliminating the specific analog and steganographic side-channels that post-hoc verification can not close. The device eliminates the need for any mutually trusted logic, while still meeting the security needs of the prover and verifier.

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs

We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. Using doubly stochastic transition matrices, we prove four theoretical guarantees: (1) exponentially decaying false positive rates via Hoeffding bounds, (2) graceful degradation under adversarial modification with closed-form expected scores, (3) information-theoretic security without key access, and (4) bounded quality loss via KL divergence. Experiments on 173 Wikipedia prompts using Llama-3.2-3B demonstrate that the optimal 7-state soft cycle configuration achieves 100\% detection, 0\% FPR, and perplexity 4.20. Robustness testing confirms detection above 96\% even with 30\% word replacement. The framework enables $O(n)$ model-free detection, addressing EU AI Act Article 50 requirements. Code available at \url{https://github.com/ChenghengLi/MCLW}

Read More

Feb 2, 2026

Prototyping an Embedded Off-Switch for AI Compute

This project prototypes an embedded off-switch for AI accelerators. The security block requires periodic cryptographic authorization to operate: the chip generates a nonce, an external authority signs it, and the chip verifies the signature before granting time-limited permission. Without valid authorization, outputs are gated to zero. The design was implemented in HardCaml and validated in simulation.

Read More

This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.
This work was done during one weekend by research workshop participants and does not represent the work of Apart Research.