Apr 25, 2025

-

Apr 27, 2025

Online & In-Person

Economics of Transformative AI

This weekend-long collaborative research event provides a structured environment to develop novel economic frameworks, models, and insights that can inform our understanding of AI's transformative potential.

09 : 00 : 46 : 31

09 : 00 : 46 : 31

09 : 00 : 46 : 31

09 : 00 : 46 : 31

This weekend-long collaborative research event provides a structured environment to develop novel economic frameworks, models, and insights that can inform our understanding of AI's transformative potential.

This event is ongoing.

This event has concluded.

19

Sign Ups

0

Entries

Overview

Resources

Guidelines

Schedule

Entries

Overview

Arrow

As AI capabilities advance rapidly, we face unprecedented economic questions: How will transformative AI reshape labor markets and productivity? What distributional effects might emerge, and how can we ensure broad-based prosperity? What governance structures and incentive systems might guide beneficial AI development? These questions demand rigorous economic analysis from diverse perspectives.

Organized by Apart Research in collaboration with BlueDot Impact, this sprint builds on BlueDot's "Economics of Transformative AI" course, providing participants with an opportunity to apply economic theory to practical research questions. While the course provides a foundation, the sprint welcomes all economists with strong analytical backgrounds interested in applying their expertise to AI safety challenges.

The sprint follows a three-phase structure: pre-event development of open research questions, an intensive weekend of collaborative research, and post-event opportunities for exceptional projects to receive continued support through our fellowship program. Join us in developing the economic tools and frameworks needed to navigate one of this century's most consequential transitions.

Why This Matters

Critical Economic Questions Demand Answers

The economic implications of transformative AI will reshape markets, institutions, and societies. Without rigorous economic analysis, we risk navigating this transition blindfolded. Traditional economic models may fail to capture the unique dynamics of transformative AI systems, including recursive self-improvement, exponential productivity growth, and unprecedented labor market effects.

Economists Bring Essential Perspectives to AI Safety

The field of AI safety has been led primarily by computer scientists and alignment researchers. Economic expertise is crucial but underrepresented. Economists bring vital methodological tools, including causal inference, game theory, mechanism design, and welfare analysis that can inform both technical alignment work and governance frameworks.

Bridging Research and Policy

Economic insights will directly inform policy responses to AI development. Your research contributions could influence governance frameworks, regulatory approaches, and international coordination efforts around AI. By developing robust economic analyses now, we can shape more effective policies before transformative capabilities emerge.

Challenge Tracks

Distribution Track

How will the benefits and risks of transformative AI be distributed across society? This track examines the distributional implications of advanced AI systems:

  • Labor Market Transitions: Analyze potential employment disruptions, wage effects, and skill premium dynamics as AI capabilities expand across domains

  • Wealth and Income Distribution: Model how capital concentration, data ownership, and algorithmic deployment might affect inequality

  • Geographic Disparities: Examine how AI impacts may differ across regions, countries, and urban/rural divides

  • Policy Interventions: Design and evaluate potential policies for ensuring broad-based prosperity, including UBI, skill transition programs, and data dividends

Distribution Track Project Ideas:

  • Distribution of AI's Economic Gains: Analyze how the "AI dividend" might be split among stakeholders - companies, workers, consumers, and society.

  • Labor Market Simulation: Model which occupations are most vulnerable to AI automation versus which might grow, and simulate the timeline of these transitions.

  • UBI in an AI Economy: Evaluate universal basic income as a policy response to AI-driven labor market disruptions, determining economic feasibility and effects.

Growth Track

How might transformative AI reshape economic growth trajectories and productivity? This track explores macroeconomic implications:

  • Productivity Modeling: Develop frameworks to predict and measure AI-driven productivity changes across sectors

  • Growth Dynamics: Explore scenarios for economic growth under different AI development trajectories

  • Innovation Systems: Analyze how AI might transform R&D processes, knowledge creation, and technological diffusion

  • Transition Management: Identify potential economic instabilities during rapid technological transition and design stabilizing mechanisms

Growth Track Project Ideas:

  • AI-GDP Growth Modeling: Build a model to project GDP growth under different AI progress assumptions, comparing scenarios of slow vs. fast automation to identify conditions for explosive economic growth.

  • Automation Bottlenecks & Baumol's Cost Disease: Examine how "automation-resistant" sectors might impact overall economic growth despite AI advances in other areas.

  • AI and Innovation: Investigate how AI systems as research tools might accelerate technological progress, potentially breaking through diminishing returns in R&D.

Market Dynamics Project Ideas:

  • AI Industry Structure Analysis: Examine whether the AI sector will tend toward oligopoly or remain competitive, based on factors like compute costs and network effects.

  • Algorithmic Collusion Simulation: Create a market simulation to test if AI pricing algorithms naturally learn to collude, threatening consumer welfare.

  • Data Markets in the AI Economy: Investigate emerging markets for data as a critical AI input, including potential market failures and governance mechanisms.

Three-Phase Structure

1. Pre-Event: Open Problems in AI Economics

Before the sprint weekend, participants gain access to:

  • A comprehensive paper on open problems in AI economics developed by our area chairs

  • Curated reading materials (5-20 pages) highlighting key concepts and current research

  • The Hackbook template to help structure research approaches

  • Discussion forums to connect with other participants and begin forming teams

We recommend reviewing these materials before the event to maximize your productive research time during the weekend.

What to Expect

Previous Apart Research sprints have attracted 300-350 participants, and we anticipate even more for this economics-focused event. You'll join interdisciplinary teams of 3-5 members based on shared research interests.

Our hackathons foster a collaborative atmosphere where participants can:

  • Develop novel research insights in a compressed timeframe

  • Receive feedback from leading experts in economics and AI safety

  • Network with researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals

  • Produce work that contributes to the growing field of AI economics

19

Sign Ups

0

Entries

Overview

Resources

Guidelines

Schedule

Entries

Overview

Arrow

As AI capabilities advance rapidly, we face unprecedented economic questions: How will transformative AI reshape labor markets and productivity? What distributional effects might emerge, and how can we ensure broad-based prosperity? What governance structures and incentive systems might guide beneficial AI development? These questions demand rigorous economic analysis from diverse perspectives.

Organized by Apart Research in collaboration with BlueDot Impact, this sprint builds on BlueDot's "Economics of Transformative AI" course, providing participants with an opportunity to apply economic theory to practical research questions. While the course provides a foundation, the sprint welcomes all economists with strong analytical backgrounds interested in applying their expertise to AI safety challenges.

The sprint follows a three-phase structure: pre-event development of open research questions, an intensive weekend of collaborative research, and post-event opportunities for exceptional projects to receive continued support through our fellowship program. Join us in developing the economic tools and frameworks needed to navigate one of this century's most consequential transitions.

Why This Matters

Critical Economic Questions Demand Answers

The economic implications of transformative AI will reshape markets, institutions, and societies. Without rigorous economic analysis, we risk navigating this transition blindfolded. Traditional economic models may fail to capture the unique dynamics of transformative AI systems, including recursive self-improvement, exponential productivity growth, and unprecedented labor market effects.

Economists Bring Essential Perspectives to AI Safety

The field of AI safety has been led primarily by computer scientists and alignment researchers. Economic expertise is crucial but underrepresented. Economists bring vital methodological tools, including causal inference, game theory, mechanism design, and welfare analysis that can inform both technical alignment work and governance frameworks.

Bridging Research and Policy

Economic insights will directly inform policy responses to AI development. Your research contributions could influence governance frameworks, regulatory approaches, and international coordination efforts around AI. By developing robust economic analyses now, we can shape more effective policies before transformative capabilities emerge.

Challenge Tracks

Distribution Track

How will the benefits and risks of transformative AI be distributed across society? This track examines the distributional implications of advanced AI systems:

  • Labor Market Transitions: Analyze potential employment disruptions, wage effects, and skill premium dynamics as AI capabilities expand across domains

  • Wealth and Income Distribution: Model how capital concentration, data ownership, and algorithmic deployment might affect inequality

  • Geographic Disparities: Examine how AI impacts may differ across regions, countries, and urban/rural divides

  • Policy Interventions: Design and evaluate potential policies for ensuring broad-based prosperity, including UBI, skill transition programs, and data dividends

Distribution Track Project Ideas:

  • Distribution of AI's Economic Gains: Analyze how the "AI dividend" might be split among stakeholders - companies, workers, consumers, and society.

  • Labor Market Simulation: Model which occupations are most vulnerable to AI automation versus which might grow, and simulate the timeline of these transitions.

  • UBI in an AI Economy: Evaluate universal basic income as a policy response to AI-driven labor market disruptions, determining economic feasibility and effects.

Growth Track

How might transformative AI reshape economic growth trajectories and productivity? This track explores macroeconomic implications:

  • Productivity Modeling: Develop frameworks to predict and measure AI-driven productivity changes across sectors

  • Growth Dynamics: Explore scenarios for economic growth under different AI development trajectories

  • Innovation Systems: Analyze how AI might transform R&D processes, knowledge creation, and technological diffusion

  • Transition Management: Identify potential economic instabilities during rapid technological transition and design stabilizing mechanisms

Growth Track Project Ideas:

  • AI-GDP Growth Modeling: Build a model to project GDP growth under different AI progress assumptions, comparing scenarios of slow vs. fast automation to identify conditions for explosive economic growth.

  • Automation Bottlenecks & Baumol's Cost Disease: Examine how "automation-resistant" sectors might impact overall economic growth despite AI advances in other areas.

  • AI and Innovation: Investigate how AI systems as research tools might accelerate technological progress, potentially breaking through diminishing returns in R&D.

Market Dynamics Project Ideas:

  • AI Industry Structure Analysis: Examine whether the AI sector will tend toward oligopoly or remain competitive, based on factors like compute costs and network effects.

  • Algorithmic Collusion Simulation: Create a market simulation to test if AI pricing algorithms naturally learn to collude, threatening consumer welfare.

  • Data Markets in the AI Economy: Investigate emerging markets for data as a critical AI input, including potential market failures and governance mechanisms.

Three-Phase Structure

1. Pre-Event: Open Problems in AI Economics

Before the sprint weekend, participants gain access to:

  • A comprehensive paper on open problems in AI economics developed by our area chairs

  • Curated reading materials (5-20 pages) highlighting key concepts and current research

  • The Hackbook template to help structure research approaches

  • Discussion forums to connect with other participants and begin forming teams

We recommend reviewing these materials before the event to maximize your productive research time during the weekend.

What to Expect

Previous Apart Research sprints have attracted 300-350 participants, and we anticipate even more for this economics-focused event. You'll join interdisciplinary teams of 3-5 members based on shared research interests.

Our hackathons foster a collaborative atmosphere where participants can:

  • Develop novel research insights in a compressed timeframe

  • Receive feedback from leading experts in economics and AI safety

  • Network with researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals

  • Produce work that contributes to the growing field of AI economics

19

Sign Ups

0

Entries

Overview

Resources

Guidelines

Schedule

Entries

Overview

Arrow

As AI capabilities advance rapidly, we face unprecedented economic questions: How will transformative AI reshape labor markets and productivity? What distributional effects might emerge, and how can we ensure broad-based prosperity? What governance structures and incentive systems might guide beneficial AI development? These questions demand rigorous economic analysis from diverse perspectives.

Organized by Apart Research in collaboration with BlueDot Impact, this sprint builds on BlueDot's "Economics of Transformative AI" course, providing participants with an opportunity to apply economic theory to practical research questions. While the course provides a foundation, the sprint welcomes all economists with strong analytical backgrounds interested in applying their expertise to AI safety challenges.

The sprint follows a three-phase structure: pre-event development of open research questions, an intensive weekend of collaborative research, and post-event opportunities for exceptional projects to receive continued support through our fellowship program. Join us in developing the economic tools and frameworks needed to navigate one of this century's most consequential transitions.

Why This Matters

Critical Economic Questions Demand Answers

The economic implications of transformative AI will reshape markets, institutions, and societies. Without rigorous economic analysis, we risk navigating this transition blindfolded. Traditional economic models may fail to capture the unique dynamics of transformative AI systems, including recursive self-improvement, exponential productivity growth, and unprecedented labor market effects.

Economists Bring Essential Perspectives to AI Safety

The field of AI safety has been led primarily by computer scientists and alignment researchers. Economic expertise is crucial but underrepresented. Economists bring vital methodological tools, including causal inference, game theory, mechanism design, and welfare analysis that can inform both technical alignment work and governance frameworks.

Bridging Research and Policy

Economic insights will directly inform policy responses to AI development. Your research contributions could influence governance frameworks, regulatory approaches, and international coordination efforts around AI. By developing robust economic analyses now, we can shape more effective policies before transformative capabilities emerge.

Challenge Tracks

Distribution Track

How will the benefits and risks of transformative AI be distributed across society? This track examines the distributional implications of advanced AI systems:

  • Labor Market Transitions: Analyze potential employment disruptions, wage effects, and skill premium dynamics as AI capabilities expand across domains

  • Wealth and Income Distribution: Model how capital concentration, data ownership, and algorithmic deployment might affect inequality

  • Geographic Disparities: Examine how AI impacts may differ across regions, countries, and urban/rural divides

  • Policy Interventions: Design and evaluate potential policies for ensuring broad-based prosperity, including UBI, skill transition programs, and data dividends

Distribution Track Project Ideas:

  • Distribution of AI's Economic Gains: Analyze how the "AI dividend" might be split among stakeholders - companies, workers, consumers, and society.

  • Labor Market Simulation: Model which occupations are most vulnerable to AI automation versus which might grow, and simulate the timeline of these transitions.

  • UBI in an AI Economy: Evaluate universal basic income as a policy response to AI-driven labor market disruptions, determining economic feasibility and effects.

Growth Track

How might transformative AI reshape economic growth trajectories and productivity? This track explores macroeconomic implications:

  • Productivity Modeling: Develop frameworks to predict and measure AI-driven productivity changes across sectors

  • Growth Dynamics: Explore scenarios for economic growth under different AI development trajectories

  • Innovation Systems: Analyze how AI might transform R&D processes, knowledge creation, and technological diffusion

  • Transition Management: Identify potential economic instabilities during rapid technological transition and design stabilizing mechanisms

Growth Track Project Ideas:

  • AI-GDP Growth Modeling: Build a model to project GDP growth under different AI progress assumptions, comparing scenarios of slow vs. fast automation to identify conditions for explosive economic growth.

  • Automation Bottlenecks & Baumol's Cost Disease: Examine how "automation-resistant" sectors might impact overall economic growth despite AI advances in other areas.

  • AI and Innovation: Investigate how AI systems as research tools might accelerate technological progress, potentially breaking through diminishing returns in R&D.

Market Dynamics Project Ideas:

  • AI Industry Structure Analysis: Examine whether the AI sector will tend toward oligopoly or remain competitive, based on factors like compute costs and network effects.

  • Algorithmic Collusion Simulation: Create a market simulation to test if AI pricing algorithms naturally learn to collude, threatening consumer welfare.

  • Data Markets in the AI Economy: Investigate emerging markets for data as a critical AI input, including potential market failures and governance mechanisms.

Three-Phase Structure

1. Pre-Event: Open Problems in AI Economics

Before the sprint weekend, participants gain access to:

  • A comprehensive paper on open problems in AI economics developed by our area chairs

  • Curated reading materials (5-20 pages) highlighting key concepts and current research

  • The Hackbook template to help structure research approaches

  • Discussion forums to connect with other participants and begin forming teams

We recommend reviewing these materials before the event to maximize your productive research time during the weekend.

What to Expect

Previous Apart Research sprints have attracted 300-350 participants, and we anticipate even more for this economics-focused event. You'll join interdisciplinary teams of 3-5 members based on shared research interests.

Our hackathons foster a collaborative atmosphere where participants can:

  • Develop novel research insights in a compressed timeframe

  • Receive feedback from leading experts in economics and AI safety

  • Network with researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals

  • Produce work that contributes to the growing field of AI economics

19

Sign Ups

0

Entries

Overview

Resources

Guidelines

Schedule

Entries

Overview

Arrow

As AI capabilities advance rapidly, we face unprecedented economic questions: How will transformative AI reshape labor markets and productivity? What distributional effects might emerge, and how can we ensure broad-based prosperity? What governance structures and incentive systems might guide beneficial AI development? These questions demand rigorous economic analysis from diverse perspectives.

Organized by Apart Research in collaboration with BlueDot Impact, this sprint builds on BlueDot's "Economics of Transformative AI" course, providing participants with an opportunity to apply economic theory to practical research questions. While the course provides a foundation, the sprint welcomes all economists with strong analytical backgrounds interested in applying their expertise to AI safety challenges.

The sprint follows a three-phase structure: pre-event development of open research questions, an intensive weekend of collaborative research, and post-event opportunities for exceptional projects to receive continued support through our fellowship program. Join us in developing the economic tools and frameworks needed to navigate one of this century's most consequential transitions.

Why This Matters

Critical Economic Questions Demand Answers

The economic implications of transformative AI will reshape markets, institutions, and societies. Without rigorous economic analysis, we risk navigating this transition blindfolded. Traditional economic models may fail to capture the unique dynamics of transformative AI systems, including recursive self-improvement, exponential productivity growth, and unprecedented labor market effects.

Economists Bring Essential Perspectives to AI Safety

The field of AI safety has been led primarily by computer scientists and alignment researchers. Economic expertise is crucial but underrepresented. Economists bring vital methodological tools, including causal inference, game theory, mechanism design, and welfare analysis that can inform both technical alignment work and governance frameworks.

Bridging Research and Policy

Economic insights will directly inform policy responses to AI development. Your research contributions could influence governance frameworks, regulatory approaches, and international coordination efforts around AI. By developing robust economic analyses now, we can shape more effective policies before transformative capabilities emerge.

Challenge Tracks

Distribution Track

How will the benefits and risks of transformative AI be distributed across society? This track examines the distributional implications of advanced AI systems:

  • Labor Market Transitions: Analyze potential employment disruptions, wage effects, and skill premium dynamics as AI capabilities expand across domains

  • Wealth and Income Distribution: Model how capital concentration, data ownership, and algorithmic deployment might affect inequality

  • Geographic Disparities: Examine how AI impacts may differ across regions, countries, and urban/rural divides

  • Policy Interventions: Design and evaluate potential policies for ensuring broad-based prosperity, including UBI, skill transition programs, and data dividends

Distribution Track Project Ideas:

  • Distribution of AI's Economic Gains: Analyze how the "AI dividend" might be split among stakeholders - companies, workers, consumers, and society.

  • Labor Market Simulation: Model which occupations are most vulnerable to AI automation versus which might grow, and simulate the timeline of these transitions.

  • UBI in an AI Economy: Evaluate universal basic income as a policy response to AI-driven labor market disruptions, determining economic feasibility and effects.

Growth Track

How might transformative AI reshape economic growth trajectories and productivity? This track explores macroeconomic implications:

  • Productivity Modeling: Develop frameworks to predict and measure AI-driven productivity changes across sectors

  • Growth Dynamics: Explore scenarios for economic growth under different AI development trajectories

  • Innovation Systems: Analyze how AI might transform R&D processes, knowledge creation, and technological diffusion

  • Transition Management: Identify potential economic instabilities during rapid technological transition and design stabilizing mechanisms

Growth Track Project Ideas:

  • AI-GDP Growth Modeling: Build a model to project GDP growth under different AI progress assumptions, comparing scenarios of slow vs. fast automation to identify conditions for explosive economic growth.

  • Automation Bottlenecks & Baumol's Cost Disease: Examine how "automation-resistant" sectors might impact overall economic growth despite AI advances in other areas.

  • AI and Innovation: Investigate how AI systems as research tools might accelerate technological progress, potentially breaking through diminishing returns in R&D.

Market Dynamics Project Ideas:

  • AI Industry Structure Analysis: Examine whether the AI sector will tend toward oligopoly or remain competitive, based on factors like compute costs and network effects.

  • Algorithmic Collusion Simulation: Create a market simulation to test if AI pricing algorithms naturally learn to collude, threatening consumer welfare.

  • Data Markets in the AI Economy: Investigate emerging markets for data as a critical AI input, including potential market failures and governance mechanisms.

Three-Phase Structure

1. Pre-Event: Open Problems in AI Economics

Before the sprint weekend, participants gain access to:

  • A comprehensive paper on open problems in AI economics developed by our area chairs

  • Curated reading materials (5-20 pages) highlighting key concepts and current research

  • The Hackbook template to help structure research approaches

  • Discussion forums to connect with other participants and begin forming teams

We recommend reviewing these materials before the event to maximize your productive research time during the weekend.

What to Expect

Previous Apart Research sprints have attracted 300-350 participants, and we anticipate even more for this economics-focused event. You'll join interdisciplinary teams of 3-5 members based on shared research interests.

Our hackathons foster a collaborative atmosphere where participants can:

  • Develop novel research insights in a compressed timeframe

  • Receive feedback from leading experts in economics and AI safety

  • Network with researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals

  • Produce work that contributes to the growing field of AI economics

Speakers & Collaborators

Jacob Schaal

Judge

Combining economics and AI governance expertise to shape responsible AI development. Jacob recently worked on EU AI Policy at the think tank Pour Demain. Explored industry competition, model evaluations and automation through agents in bodies such as the EU, the CEN/CENELEC, and the OECD.

Joseph Levine

Judge

Joseph Levine is a third-year Economics PhD student at Oxford University. His research focuses on development, public, and agricultural economics, including co-leading an RCT on taxation in The Gambia. Previously, Joseph worked as an aerospace economist at Bryce Space and Technology, drove ambulances in Maryland, and spent 2021 in Sierra Leone implementing research on energy and health economics.

Rubi Hudson

Judge

Rubi Hudson is a 3rd year Economics PhD student at University of Toronto researching AI alignment and transformative AI using microeconomic theory. With a BMath from Waterloo, he was an early MATS participant and now organizes the Mechanism Design for AI Safety reading group.

Donghyun Suh

Judge

Donghyun Suh is an economist at the Bank of Korea's Research Department specializing in macroeconomics, AI economics, and inequality. With a PhD from University of Virginia, he researches how technology affects labor markets, including AGI transition scenarios and automation economics. His work on technological change and top labour incomes is under revision at Review of Economic Studies.

Joel Christoph

Organiser

Joel Christoph, Area Chair for Apart Research's Economics of AI Sprint, is an Economics PhD Researcher at the European University Institute and Japan-IMF Scholar specializing in economic governance of emerging technologies. His experience spans the World Bank, Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, and founding both 10Billion.org and Formal Markets (which develops advance market commitments for beneficial AI). He was selected as a Harvard Kennedy School Technology & Human Rights Fellow and brings international perspective from research conducted across Europe, Asia, and North America.

Matthias Endres

Organiser

Matthias Endres is a PhD student in Economics at the University of Warwick. He holds a Masters Degree from the Paris School of Economics and a Bachelor of Science from the University of Cologne. Matthias worked in research positions at the Global Priorities Institute at Oxford University, INSEAD and the University of Zurich. Matthias has worked on diverse topics spanning from applied microeconomics, the economics of wellbeing, development economics and corporate social responsibility. His most research explores the intersections of Behavioural Economics and AI

Fabian Braesemann

Judge

Dr. Fabian Braesemann is a Departmental Research Lecturer in AI and Work at Oxford Internet Institute. He analyzes large datasets to understand complex systems in business, society, and politics. His research appears in leading academic journals, and he writes for international media while speaking at conferences and public events.


Alex Foster

Judge

Alex Foster is an AI economist and technologist with 7+ years in machine learning. He researches AI economics with Convergence Analysis on the Threshold 2030 Report and serves as an Affiliate Research Fellow at Unjournal.org focusing on distributed AI governance. Alex advises the Institute for Ethics in Emerging Technology (IEET)


Joshua Landes

Organiser

Joshua Landes leads Community & Training at BlueDot Impact, where he runs the AISF community and facilitates AI Governance and Economics of Transformative AI courses. Previously, he worked at AI Safety Germany and the Center for AI Safety, after managing political campaigns for FDP in Germany.

Jaime Raldua

Organiser

Jaime has 8+ years of experience in the tech industry. Started his own data consultancy to support EA Organisations and currently works at Apart Research as Research Engineer.

Speakers & Collaborators

Jacob Schaal

Judge

Combining economics and AI governance expertise to shape responsible AI development. Jacob recently worked on EU AI Policy at the think tank Pour Demain. Explored industry competition, model evaluations and automation through agents in bodies such as the EU, the CEN/CENELEC, and the OECD.

Joseph Levine

Judge

Joseph Levine is a third-year Economics PhD student at Oxford University. His research focuses on development, public, and agricultural economics, including co-leading an RCT on taxation in The Gambia. Previously, Joseph worked as an aerospace economist at Bryce Space and Technology, drove ambulances in Maryland, and spent 2021 in Sierra Leone implementing research on energy and health economics.

Rubi Hudson

Judge

Rubi Hudson is a 3rd year Economics PhD student at University of Toronto researching AI alignment and transformative AI using microeconomic theory. With a BMath from Waterloo, he was an early MATS participant and now organizes the Mechanism Design for AI Safety reading group.

Donghyun Suh

Judge

Donghyun Suh is an economist at the Bank of Korea's Research Department specializing in macroeconomics, AI economics, and inequality. With a PhD from University of Virginia, he researches how technology affects labor markets, including AGI transition scenarios and automation economics. His work on technological change and top labour incomes is under revision at Review of Economic Studies.

Joel Christoph

Organiser

Joel Christoph, Area Chair for Apart Research's Economics of AI Sprint, is an Economics PhD Researcher at the European University Institute and Japan-IMF Scholar specializing in economic governance of emerging technologies. His experience spans the World Bank, Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, and founding both 10Billion.org and Formal Markets (which develops advance market commitments for beneficial AI). He was selected as a Harvard Kennedy School Technology & Human Rights Fellow and brings international perspective from research conducted across Europe, Asia, and North America.

Matthias Endres

Organiser

Matthias Endres is a PhD student in Economics at the University of Warwick. He holds a Masters Degree from the Paris School of Economics and a Bachelor of Science from the University of Cologne. Matthias worked in research positions at the Global Priorities Institute at Oxford University, INSEAD and the University of Zurich. Matthias has worked on diverse topics spanning from applied microeconomics, the economics of wellbeing, development economics and corporate social responsibility. His most research explores the intersections of Behavioural Economics and AI

Fabian Braesemann

Judge

Dr. Fabian Braesemann is a Departmental Research Lecturer in AI and Work at Oxford Internet Institute. He analyzes large datasets to understand complex systems in business, society, and politics. His research appears in leading academic journals, and he writes for international media while speaking at conferences and public events.


Alex Foster

Judge

Alex Foster is an AI economist and technologist with 7+ years in machine learning. He researches AI economics with Convergence Analysis on the Threshold 2030 Report and serves as an Affiliate Research Fellow at Unjournal.org focusing on distributed AI governance. Alex advises the Institute for Ethics in Emerging Technology (IEET)


Joshua Landes

Organiser

Joshua Landes leads Community & Training at BlueDot Impact, where he runs the AISF community and facilitates AI Governance and Economics of Transformative AI courses. Previously, he worked at AI Safety Germany and the Center for AI Safety, after managing political campaigns for FDP in Germany.

Jaime Raldua

Organiser

Jaime has 8+ years of experience in the tech industry. Started his own data consultancy to support EA Organisations and currently works at Apart Research as Research Engineer.

Registered Jam Sites

Register A Location

Beside the remote and virtual participation, our amazing organizers also host local hackathon locations where you can meet up in-person and connect with others in your area.

The in-person events for the Apart Sprints are run by passionate individuals just like you! We organize the schedule, speakers, and starter templates, and you can focus on engaging your local research, student, and engineering community.

We haven't announced jam sites yet

Check back later

Registered Jam Sites

Register A Location

Beside the remote and virtual participation, our amazing organizers also host local hackathon locations where you can meet up in-person and connect with others in your area.

The in-person events for the Apart Sprints are run by passionate individuals just like you! We organize the schedule, speakers, and starter templates, and you can focus on engaging your local research, student, and engineering community.

We haven't announced jam sites yet

Check back later