
Apr 25 - 27, 2025Online
Economics of Transformative AI
This weekend-long collaborative research event provides a structured environment to develop novel economic frameworks, models, and insights that can inform our understanding of AI's transformative potential.
Entries
- 1st place by peer reviewView project: The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence
The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence
Team One Of The Teams · London / Paris / Spain / California
We investigate the economic potential of Transformative AI, focusing on "temporal coherence"—the ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time—as a critical, yet underexplored, factor in task automation. We argue that temporal coherence represents a significant bottleneck distinct from computational complexity. …
- 3rd place by peer reviewView project: Evaluating the risk of job displacement by transformative AI automation in developing countries: A case study on Brazil
Evaluating the risk of job displacement by transformative AI automation in developing countries: A case study on Brazil
Team Econs of TAI International · Nigeria, UAE, Egypt, and India
In this paper, we introduce an empirical and reproducible approach to monitoring job displacement by TAI. We first classify occupations based on current prompting behavior from a novel dataset from Anthropic, linking 4 million Claude Sonnet 3.7 prompts to tasks from the O*NET occupation taxonomy. We then develop a …
- 3rd place by peer reviewView project: Economics of AI Data Center Energy Infrastructure: Strategic Blueprint for 2030
Economics of AI Data Center Energy Infrastructure: Strategic Blueprint for 2030
Boston, MA
AI data centers are projected to triple U.S. electricity demand by 2030, outpacing the energy sector’s ability to respond. This research identifies three core failures—coordination gaps between AI and grid development, public underinvestment in reliability, and missing markets for long-term capacity—and proposes a …
- 4th place by peer reviewView project: Economic Feasibility of Universal High Income (UHI) in an Age of Advanced Automation
Economic Feasibility of Universal High Income (UHI) in an Age of Advanced Automation
Team Universe Zero · UAE, UK, Taiwan and USA
This paper analyzes five interlinked fiscal measures proposed to fund a Universal High Income (UHI) system in response to large-scale technological automation: a unity wealth tax, an unused land and property tax, progressive income tax reform, and the Artificial Intelligence Dividend Income (AIDI) program. Using …
- View project: Economic Impact Analysis: The Impact of AI on the Indian IT Sector
Economic Impact Analysis: The Impact of AI on the Indian IT Sector
Team alina-maimuna · Hyderabad(India) and Budapest (Hungary
We studied AI’s impact on India’s IT sector. We modelled a 20% labour shock and proposed upskilling and insurance policies to reduce AI-driven job losses.
- View project: Redistributing the AI Dividend: Modeling Data as Labor in a Transformative Economy
Redistributing the AI Dividend: Modeling Data as Labor in a Transformative Economy
Team Mirrorball Society
The economic transformations induced by artificial intelligence (AI) raise pressing distributional concerns. This paper examines the allocation of the AI Dividend—the surplus value generated through AI advancements—and proposes mechanisms to ensure equitable redistribution. Anchoring our analysis in the Distribution …
- View project: US-1: Full AI Nationalization can cause Misaligned Economic Incentives
US-1: Full AI Nationalization can cause Misaligned Economic Incentives
Team Economics and Nationalization · Chicago
The escalating geostrategic importance of frontier AI development increases the likelihood of nationalization. While no explicit plans have emerged in the United States, such action would likely be swift and comprehensive. A government seizure of critical AI infrastructure would fundamentally transform the sector's …
- View project: Data as Capital in TAI Economies: A Biomorphic Framework
Data as Capital in TAI Economies: A Biomorphic Framework
London
This research introduces a novel theoretical framework for understanding data's role in Transformative Artificial Intelligence (TAI) economies. Traditional economic models inadequately capture data's unique properties in TAI systems: its non-rivalry, increasing returns, variable depreciation, and context-dependent …
- View project: The Rate of AI Adoption and Its Implications for Economic Growth and Disparities.
The Rate of AI Adoption and Its Implications for Economic Growth and Disparities.
Team Eurasia (PT, DE, IN, SG) · Lisbon
This project examines the economic impacts of AI adoption, focusing on its potential to increase productivity while also widening income inequality and regional disparities. It explores the factors influencing adoption rates across industries and concludes with policy recommendations aimed at mitigating these …
- View project: Economics of TAI Sprint Submission: A Recursively-Inspired Framework and Simulation Results for Evaluating a Value-Based UBI Policy
Economics of TAI Sprint Submission: A Recursively-Inspired Framework and Simulation Results for Evaluating a Value-Based UBI Policy
Team UBI Resilience Project · Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The potential for Transformative AI (TAI) to exacerbate inequality necessitates exploring novel redistributive policies. This document presents a comprehensive framework and reports results from a conceptual simulation study evaluating the economic implications of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) funded by a significant …
- View project: Mitigating AI-Driven Income Inequality in Africa LMICs
Mitigating AI-Driven Income Inequality in Africa LMICs
This project examines how Transformative AI (TAI) could reshape economic growth in African labor markets, potentially deepening inequality if its benefits are not equitably distributed. As AI automates processes and shifts workforce dynamics, understanding its AI distribution effects is crucial to preventing …
- View project: Impact of generative AI on tobacco, investment and tourism industry
Impact of generative AI on tobacco, investment and tourism industry
Team Blank · World
I examine how introducing Gen AI solutions in companies in the tourism, investment and tobacco sectors affects labour productivity using DiD. This falls under the Growth track, which studies how technological innovations drive economic growth. Economic theory (and intuition) suggests that AI-driven automation can …
Overview
Here are the winning Projects from the Sprint:
- First Prize: The Early Economic Impacts of Transformative AI: A Focus on Temporal Coherence: Investigates how AI's ability to maintain goal-directed behavior over time determines automation potential and economic impacts
- Second Prize: Evaluating the risk of job displacement by transformative AI automation in developing countries Analyzes job displacement risks using 4 million Claude prompts mapped to occupation data in Brazil's labor market.
- Third Prize: Economics of AI Data Center Energy Infrastructure: Strategic Blueprint for 2030 Examines economic bottlenecks and policy solutions for AI infrastructure as energy demand triples by 2030
- Fourth Prize: Economic Feasibility of Universal High Income (UHI) in an Age of Advanced Automation: Evaluates fiscal measures including wealth taxes and AI dividends to fund UHI during mass technological unemployment.
As AI capabilities advance rapidly, we face unprecedented economic questions: How will transformative AI reshape labor markets and productivity? What distributional effects might emerge, and how can we ensure broad-based prosperity? What governance structures and incentive systems might guide beneficial AI development? These questions demand rigorous economic analysis from diverse perspectives.
Organized by Apart Research in collaboration with BlueDot Impact, this sprint builds on BlueDot's "Economics of Transformative AI" course, providing participants with an opportunity to apply economic theory to practical research questions. While the course provides a foundation, the sprint welcomes all economists with strong analytical backgrounds interested in applying their expertise to AI safety challenges.
The sprint follows a three-phase structure: pre-event development of open research questions, an intensive weekend of collaborative research, and post-event opportunities for exceptional projects to receive continued support through our fellowship program. Join us in developing the economic tools and frameworks needed to navigate one of this century's most consequential transitions.
Why This Matters
Critical Economic Questions Demand Answers
The economic implications of transformative AI will reshape markets, institutions, and societies. Without rigorous economic analysis, we risk navigating this transition blindfolded. Traditional economic models may fail to capture the unique dynamics of transformative AI systems, including recursive self-improvement, exponential productivity growth, and unprecedented labor market effects.
Economists Bring Essential Perspectives to AI Safety
The field of AI safety has been led primarily by computer scientists and alignment researchers. Economic expertise is crucial but underrepresented. Economists bring vital methodological tools, including causal inference, game theory, mechanism design, and welfare analysis that can inform both technical alignment work and governance frameworks.
Bridging Research and Policy
Economic insights will directly inform policy responses to AI development. Your research contributions could influence governance frameworks, regulatory approaches, and international coordination efforts around AI. By developing robust economic analyses now, we can shape more effective policies before transformative capabilities emerge.
Challenge Tracks
Distribution Track
How will the benefits and risks of transformative AI be distributed across society? This track examines the distributional implications of advanced AI systems:
- Labor Market Transitions: Analyze potential employment disruptions, wage effects, and skill premium dynamics as AI capabilities expand across domains
- Wealth and Income Distribution: Model how capital concentration, data ownership, and algorithmic deployment might affect inequality
- Geographic Disparities: Examine how AI impacts may differ across regions, countries, and urban/rural divides
- Policy Interventions: Design and evaluate potential policies for ensuring broad-based prosperity, including UBI, skill transition programs, and data dividends
Distribution Track Project Ideas:
- Distribution of AI's Economic Gains: Analyze how the "AI dividend" might be split among stakeholders - companies, workers, consumers, and society.
- Labor Market Simulation: Model which occupations are most vulnerable to AI automation versus which might grow, and simulate the timeline of these transitions.
- UBI in an AI Economy: Evaluate universal basic income as a policy response to AI-driven labor market disruptions, determining economic feasibility and effects.
Growth Track
How might transformative AI reshape economic growth trajectories and productivity? This track explores macroeconomic implications:
- Productivity Modeling: Develop frameworks to predict and measure AI-driven productivity changes across sectors
- Growth Dynamics: Explore scenarios for economic growth under different AI development trajectories
- Innovation Systems: Analyze how AI might transform R&D processes, knowledge creation, and technological diffusion
- Transition Management: Identify potential economic instabilities during rapid technological transition and design stabilizing mechanisms
Growth Track Project Ideas:
- AI-GDP Growth Modeling: Build a model to project GDP growth under different AI progress assumptions, comparing scenarios of slow vs. fast automation to identify conditions for explosive economic growth.
- Automation Bottlenecks & Baumol's Cost Disease: Examine how "automation-resistant" sectors might impact overall economic growth despite AI advances in other areas.
- AI and Innovation: Investigate how AI systems as research tools might accelerate technological progress, potentially breaking through diminishing returns in R&D.
Market Dynamics Project Ideas:
- AI Industry Structure Analysis: Examine whether the AI sector will tend toward oligopoly or remain competitive, based on factors like compute costs and network effects.
- Algorithmic Collusion Simulation: Create a market simulation to test if AI pricing algorithms naturally learn to collude, threatening consumer welfare.
- Data Markets in the AI Economy: Investigate emerging markets for data as a critical AI input, including potential market failures and governance mechanisms.
Three-Phase Structure
1. Pre-Event: Open Problems in AI Economics
Before the sprint weekend, participants gain access to:
- A comprehensive paper on open problems in AI economics developed by our area chairs
- Curated reading materials (5-20 pages) highlighting key concepts and current research
- The Hackbook template to help structure research approaches
- Discussion forums to connect with other participants and begin forming teams
We recommend reviewing these materials before the event to maximize your productive research time during the weekend.
What to Expect
Previous Apart Research sprints have attracted 300-350 participants, and we anticipate even more for this economics-focused event. You'll join interdisciplinary teams of 3-5 members based on shared research interests.
Our hackathons foster a collaborative atmosphere where participants can:
- Develop novel research insights in a compressed timeframe
- Receive feedback from leading experts in economics and AI safety
- Network with researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals
- Produce work that contributes to the growing field of AI economics
Resources
To help focus your research efforts, we strongly encourage you to review:
- Open Problems in the Economics of Transformative AI document: This foundational text outlines the key research questions in the field and provides essential context for your sprint projects.
- Research Directions Document: This practical guide translates broad questions into focused, actionable research directions suitable for the sprint format. It's specifically designed to help you develop novel insights within our compressed timeframe.
Guidelines
Your submission must include:

- A completed project report using the provided template
- In case, you want to use Overleaf, here is a template for that
- Link to a public GitHub repository with your code(optional)
- A brief (2-3 minute) video demonstration (optional but recommended)
Important: Include an appendix called "Prompts Used" in your submission that documents any LLM prompts used in your project. This helps others understand exactly what was done with the LLM and improves reproducibility.
What background knowledge is required? The sprint primarily targets economists with strong analytical backgrounds who can apply their expertise to AI safety questions. While familiarity with AI concepts is helpful, we welcome participants with diverse backgrounds in economics, including macroeconomics, labor economics, public economics, and development economics.
How are teams formed? Teams will self-organize during the first day based on shared research interests. We'll facilitate team formation through structured activities and interest-matching. You're also welcome to form teams in advance with other registered participants.
What are the expected outputs? Teams will produce research briefs (4-8 pages) outlining their approach, methodology, preliminary findings, and directions for future work. The most promising projects may evolve into academic papers or policy briefs following the sprint.
Will compute resources be provided? Yes, we'll provide access to computational resources for teams requiring data analysis, simulations, or modeling tools.
How will projects be evaluated? Projects will be assessed on:
- Research quality & scalability
- AI safety relevance & impact potential
- Technical quality & methodology
- Innovation & literature foundation
About Apart Sprints
Apart Research organizes research sprints bringing together diverse experts to tackle crucial questions in AI safety. Our sprints have produced numerous published papers, sparked ongoing research collaborations, and helped identify promising directions in AI safety research.
Previous sprints have focused on topics including mechanistic interpretability, AI security, control systems, and multi-agent dynamics. The Economics of Transformative AI Research Sprint represents our commitment to bringing economic expertise into the broader AI safety ecosystem.
Join us in developing the economic frameworks needed to navigate the transition to transformative AI systems.
Schedule
Friday (April 25, 4:00 PM - 8:00 PM UTC)
- Welcome and introduction to the sprint format
- Keynote presentation on the state of AI economics research: Join our distinguished speaker for insights into the economics of transformative AI, examining current modeling challenges, emerging research directions, and future priorities for the field.
- Team Matchmaking Session: Find your ideal Economics Research Sprint teammates in this structured networking event! Present your skills and research interests, connect with complementary collaborators, and form balanced teams across our Distribution and Growth challenge tracks.
- Social networking opportunity
Saturday (April 26, 9:00 AM - 10:00 PM UTC)
- Focused research and development time
- Expert office hours with mentors throughout the day
- Office Hours (1:00 - 2:00 PM): Get expert feedback on your research approaches to labor markets, wealth distribution, and policy interventions from mentors specializing in distributional economics.
- Office Hours (21:00- 22:00): Consult with growth economics experts on your research examining productivity effects, innovation dynamics, and macroeconomic impacts of transformative AI.
- HackTalk: (5:00 - 6:00 PM): Take a break from your project work to gain valuable insights on research methodologies relevant to AI economics, including analytical approaches, modeling techniques, and interdisciplinary frameworks that can immediately enhance your research sprint project.
Sunday (April 27, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM UTC)
- Continued research development
- General Economics Office Hours (13:00 - 14:00 AM): Final opportunity to discuss your economic models and analytical approaches with our expert mentors before project finalization.
- Project finalization and preparation of submissions
Post-Event
- Submission Deadline (Monday, April 28, 4:00 - 5:00 AM): Final call for Economics of Transformative AI Research Sprint project submissions! Complete your economic analysis, modeling documentation, and presentation materials.
- Award Ceremony (Thursday, May 1, 4:00 - 5:30 PM): The research sprint might be ending, but the impact continues! Don't miss our Lightning Talks featuring winning projects and special guests. Learn which teams will be invited to the fellowship program.
Speakers

Yulu Pi
Judge and Hacktalk Speaker
Yulu Pi is a PhD researcher at the University of Warwick and a Turing Institute Enrichment Fellow, focusing on human-AI interaction and AI governance. She co-developed the High-Risk EU AI Act Toolkit at the University of Cambridge. Prior to her PhD, she worked with governmental and international organizations across both the Global North and South. She has a background in Economics and Data Science. Most recently, she led a team that won the Women in AI Safety Hackathon with their project on detecting malicious AI agents through simulated interactions.

Anton Korinek
Keynote Speaker
Anton Korinek is a Professor at the University of Virginia's Department of Economics and Darden School of Business, and a Visiting Scholar at the Brookings Institution. His research explores the economics of transformative AI, investigating implications for growth, labor markets, and inequality. His work has been featured in the New York Times, Washington Post, and The Economist.

Deric Cheng
Hacktalk Speaker
Deric is currently an AI policy researcher at Convergence Analysis, leading the Governance Program. He is one of only a few researchers worldwide who concentrate on economic governance strategies to navigate the upcoming AGI economic transformation. He has previously hosted a conference on AI economic impacts and researched foundational AI governance policies (e.g., chip registries and model registries) and soft nationalization scenarios.
Judges and mentors
- (opens in new tab)

Jacob Schaal
Judge
- (opens in new tab)

Joseph Levine
Judge
- (opens in new tab)

Rubi Hudson
Judge
- (opens in new tab)

Donghyun Suh
Judge
- (opens in new tab)

Fabian Braesemann
Judge
- (opens in new tab)

Alex Foster
Judge
- (opens in new tab)

Cecilia Wood
Judge

Duncan MacClemens
Judge
- (opens in new tab)

Luke Drago
Judge

Axel Backlund
Judge
Organizers
Local sites
Economics of Transformative AI Hackathon
Have you been wondering about the potentially transformative effects of AI on the economy? Do you want to help mitigating the associated risks? Join us at CEEALAR in Blackpool for the Apart Research and BlueDot Impact's 'Economics of Transformative AI Hackathon' to work on the issue and to learn more. The Jam Site will be open from 10am-8pm for people to work here in person together. Please RSVP here to join the site https://lu.ma/jmv8dkz4 Remote collaborators can join projects without joining the jam site. Just reach out on Discord after signing up to the Hackathon
Event page: Economics of Transformative AI Hackathon (opens in new tab)London - Economics of Transformative AI Hackathon
This event is for the local London hacksite run by Joshua Landes. It will run at LISA on Sat and Sun - please join the Fri component virtually here. Join us in developing the economic tools and frameworks needed to navigate one of this century's most consequential transitions.
Event page: London - Economics of Transformative AI Hackathon (opens in new tab)
Where a Sprint can lead
How our programs connectAnyone can join
Stand out
6 to 16 weeks on your own project, with a research project manager, compute and publication support.
Upcoming Sprints
All SprintsAI Collusion Research Sprint
A weekend research sprint on collusion between AI agents: when it emerges in markets and everyday workflows, how to detect and audit it, how it is carried, and what breaks it. Co-organized with Poseidon Research and AE Studio, online with in-person hubs at Collider in New York City and AI Safety Hong Kong. Top teams are invited to apply to the Apart Fellowship.
Read the brief: AI Collusion Research SprintSwarm Alignment Hackathon
Alignment can't stop at single models when AI agents start to negotiate, trade and share tools. Spend a weekend uncovering and preventing failures that emerge between multiple agents.
Read the brief: Swarm Alignment HackathonQuestions? sprints@apartresearch.com



