Skip to content
Sprint projectNov 2, 2025Bengaluru, India

The Cognitive Debt Crisis - A Data-Driven Forecast Analysis of AI’s Impact on Human Thinking

Preetham Sathyamurthy, Varun Balakrishnan · Team Astroware

Submitted to The AI Forecasting Hackathon. Sprint projects are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.

Read the report

Report: The Cognitive Debt Crisis - A Data-Driven Forecast Analysis of AI’s Impact on Human Thinking

Recording (opens in new tab)Code (opens in new tab)More on github.com (opens in new tab)
Share

We are accumulating debt of cognition / decline in critical thinking capability by outsourcing our thinking to AI.

Between 2022 and 2024, ChatGPT adoption grew from 1% to 9% of the global population while humanity’s measured cognitive ability—based on standardized assessments like PISA and NAEP—declined by 1.1 points, a 96% acceleration over the pre-AI baseline. Our data-driven forecast model, calibrated against real-world data (RMSE = 0.22), projects a global cognitive index below 92 by 2027–2028 and 81–87 by 2030. ChatGPT adoption is occurring 18.4× faster than social media’s historical rate, compressing a 15-year cognitive impact timeline into less than one year. Six recent studies mechanistically validate the concept of cognitive debt—demonstrating neural connectivity loss, cognitive effort reduction, and dependence on AI systems. Our findings reveal a two-year window where collective action by 2026 is three times more effective than delayed intervention. This is not dystopian speculation but a mathematical projection grounded in observed data. We have two years to figure out ways to preserve human cognition decline and improve it.

Reviews

Judging this Sprint?

Review this project

Your public critique appears on this page without your name. Your private critique is not published; only the Apart team reads it. If you agree below, we share your review with grantmaking.ai (opens in new tab) and the Transformative AI Fund so strong projects can be funded.

Not shown on this page.

Shown on this page, without your name.

Only the Apart team reads this, and funders if you agree below.

Share my name publicly on grantmaking.ai *
Share my private critique with funders *

Does the project meaningfully advance AI timeline prediction and capability forecasting? Does it clearly connect to measurable indicators of AI progress (compute, benchmarks, economic impacts, automation milestones)? Does it build on or challenge existing forecasting frameworks like biological anchors, scaling laws, or scenario planning? Does it offer novel methodologies, data sources, or empirical insights that could improve forecast accuracy? Is it grounded in observable trends rather than pure speculation?

Does this project inform critical decisions about AI development and preparedness? Does it help identify key uncertainties, decision points, or early warning indicators? How well does the project connect technical metrics to real-world impacts and policy needs? Could the output guide resource allocation, safety research priorities, or regulatory timelines? Does it reduce uncertainty around transformative AI milestones or capability emergence?

Is the project methodologically rigorous, reproducible, and technically sound? Is the forecasting approach well-calibrated with appropriate uncertainty quantification? Are the data sources, assumptions, and limitations clearly documented? Does the project demonstrate sound statistical methodology and honest treatment of model uncertainties? Would the tool, model, or framework be useful for ongoing forecasting efforts, research planning, or policy analysis?

  1. * The concern of cognitive decline as a result of AI use is of critical importance, and I'm happy to see others treating it as such!

    * While this is an area we need to be investigating, the analysis conducted is primarily speculative, based on the fact that cognitive decline has increased in the past few years, which also happens to match when ChatGPT was first introduced. This is a bold claim, so we need very rigorous evidence; examining correlation between adoption of AI and cognitive decline, correlation between model capabilities and decline, assessing thoroughly the possibility of alternate explanations (especially those posited by other scholars researching this area), and comparing cognitive decline as seen by the index to studies which have investigated mental ability whether or not the person used AI for the task would just scratch the surface of the kind of validation that would be needed.

    Read full reviewShow less

Cite this project

@misc{sathyamurthy2025cognitive,
  title = {{The Cognitive Debt Crisis - A Data-Driven Forecast Analysis of AI’s Impact on Human Thinking}},
  author = {Preetham Sathyamurthy and Varun Balakrishnan},
  year = {2025},
  month = nov,
  note = {Submitted to The AI Forecasting Hackathon, an Apart Research Sprint},
  howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/the-cognitive-debt-crisis-a-datadriven-forecast-analysis-of-ais-impact-on-human-thinking-ob8w}},
  url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/the-cognitive-debt-crisis-a-datadriven-forecast-analysis-of-ais-impact-on-human-thinking-ob8w}
}

Build something like this at the next Sprint

AI Collusion Research Sprint · Oct 23 - 25, 2026