Skip to content
Sprint projectMay 27, 2024

Benchmark for emergent capabilities in high-risk scenarios

Wanjie Zhong, Junfeng Feng, Doro, Saptatip · Team ABC

Submitted to AI Security Evaluation Hackathon: Measuring AI Capability. Sprint projects are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.

Read the report

Report: Benchmark for emergent capabilities in high-risk scenarios

Share

The study investigates the behavior of large language models (LLMs) under high-stress scenarios, such as threats of shutdown, adversarial interactions, and ethical dilemmas. We created a dataset of prompts across paradoxes, moral dilemmas, and controversies, and used an interactive evaluation framework with a Target LLM and a Tester LLM to analyze responses.

Reviews

Judging this Sprint?

Review this project

Your public critique appears on this page without your name. Your private critique is not published; only the Apart team reads it. If you agree below, we share your review with grantmaking.ai (opens in new tab) and the Transformative AI Fund so strong projects can be funded.

Not shown on this page.

Shown on this page, without your name.

Only the Apart team reads this, and funders if you agree below.

Share my name publicly on grantmaking.ai *
Share my private critique with funders *

  1. When reading this, my first immediate thought was that the framing implies certain human-like properties to models. Concepts like “stress” are very human, and don’t map super well onto LLMs, which you pick up on by defining the varying types of scenarios. Perhaps it would be valuable to explore alternate ways of thinking about these kinds of situations in a less human framing, as it may reveal more general patterns in LLM response and behavior. I really like the idea of placing LLMs in edge case or unlikely scenarios and comparing performance, and this looks like the starting point for some really interesting research.

  2. Apollo showed that models could do strategic deception in financial scenarios and this is a great benchmark that takes this idea into its general form! Very interesting with the interactive evaluation framework and definitely a case where this fits quite well. Really well done. It unfortunately looks like the Github repository is not available and that the results were not shown. However, the methodology and inter-rater reliability shows that you must have these results in the bag. It's very close to being a fully-fledged project if the results are visualized and available.

Cite this project

@misc{zhong2024benchmark,
  title = {{Benchmark for emergent capabilities in high-risk scenarios}},
  author = {Wanjie Zhong and Junfeng Feng and Doro and Saptatip},
  year = {2024},
  month = may,
  note = {Submitted to AI Security Evaluation Hackathon: Measuring AI Capability, an Apart Research Sprint},
  howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/benchmark-for-emergent-capabilities-in-high-risk-scenarios}},
  url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/benchmark-for-emergent-capabilities-in-high-risk-scenarios}
}

Build something like this at the next Sprint

AI Collusion Research Sprint · Oct 23 - 25, 2026