Implementing a Human-centered AI Assessment Framework (HAAF) for Equitable AI Development
Elise Racine · Team Humans for Human-Centered AI
Submitted to Howard University AI Safety Summit & Policy Hackathon. Projects from partner hackathons are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.
Current AI development, concentrated in the Global North, creates measurable harms for billions worldwide. Healthcare AI systems provide suboptimal care in Global South contexts, facial recognition technologies misidentify non-white individuals (Birhane, 2022; Buolamwini & Gebru, 2018), and content moderation systems fail to understand cultural nuances (Sambasivan et al., 2021). With 14 of 15 largest AI companies based in the US (Stash, 2024), affected communities lack meaningful opportunities to shape how these technologies are developed and deployed in their contexts.
This memo proposes mandatory implementation of the Human-centered AI Assessment Framework (HAAF), requiring pre-deployment impact assessments, resourced community participation, and clear accountability mechanisms. Implementation requires $10M over 24 months, beginning with pilot programs at five organizations. Success metrics include increased AI adoption in underserved contexts, improved system performance across diverse populations, and meaningful transfer of decision-making power to affected communities. The framework's emphasis on building local capacity and ensuring fair compensation for community contributions provides a practical pathway to more equitable AI development. Early adoption will help organizations build trust while developing more effective systems, delivering benefits for both industry and communities.
Reviews
Good problem statement and well-researched. Implementation strategy makes sense and is reasonable. Clearly communicated and well-thought-out success metrics
Would be useful to touch upon how this would in diverse regulatory ecosystems (eg data protection). As well as expanding on the mechanisms to secure industry buy-in, such as additional financial incentives/punishments or partnerships with major AI firms (as they would likely be resistant due to adding extra work). There is a disparity in talent/hardware etc in the Global south, how would this effect the implementation?
Cite this project
@misc{racine2024implementing,
title = {{Implementing a Human-centered AI Assessment Framework (HAAF) for Equitable AI Development}},
author = {Elise Racine},
year = {2024},
month = nov,
note = {Submitted to Howard University AI Safety Summit \& Policy Hackathon, a partner hackathon},
howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/implementing-a-human-centered-ai-assessment-framework-(haaf)-for-equitable-ai-development}},
url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/implementing-a-human-centered-ai-assessment-framework-(haaf)-for-equitable-ai-development}
}More from Howard University AI Safety Summit & Policy Hackathon
- 1st place by peer reviewView project: Promoting School-Level Accountability for the Responsible Deployment of AI and Related Systems in K-12 Education: Mitigating Bias and Increasing Transparency
Promoting School-Level Accountability for the Responsible Deployment of AI and Related Systems in K-12 Education: Mitigating Bias and Increasing Transparency
This policy memorandum draws attention to the potential for bias and opaqueness in intelligent systems utilized in K–12 education, which can worsen inequality. The U.S. Department of Education is advised to put Title I …
- View project: AI Monitoring as a Rapid and Scalable Policy Solution: Weekly Global Bulletins on AI Developments
AI Monitoring as a Rapid and Scalable Policy Solution: Weekly Global Bulletins on AI Developments
Team 1
Weekly AI monitoring bulletins that disseminated through official national and international channels aim to keep the public informed of both the positive and negative developments in AI, empowering individuals to take …
- View project: A Fundamental Rethinking to AI Evaluations: Establishing a Constitution-Based Framework
A Fundamental Rethinking to AI Evaluations: Establishing a Constitution-Based Framework
Unit 1112
While artificial intelligence (AI) presents transformative opportunities across various sectors, current safety evaluation approaches remain inadequate in preventing misuse and ensuring ethical alignment. This paper …