Skip to content
Sprint projectOct 27, 2024

Mapping Intent: Documenting Policy Adherence with Ontology Extraction

Alejandra de Brunner, Mia Hopman, Jack Wittmayer · Team Ontology Guardians

Submitted to AI Policy Hackathon at Johns Hopkins University. Sprint projects are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.

Read the report

Report: Mapping Intent: Documenting Policy Adherence with Ontology Extraction

Recording (opens in new tab)Code (opens in new tab)
Share

This project addresses the AI policy challenge of governing agentic systems by making their decision-making processes more accessible. Our solution utilizes an adaptive policy ontology integrated into a chatbot to clearly visualize and analyze its decision-making process. By creating explicit mappings between user inputs, policy rules, and risk levels, our system enables better governance of AI agents by making their reasoning traceable and adjustable. This approach facilitates continuous policy refinement and could aid in detecting and mitigating harmful outcomes. Our results demonstrate this with the example of “tricking” an agent into giving violent advice by caveating the request saying it is for a “video game”. Indeed, the ontology clearly shows where the policy falls short. This approach could be scaled to provide more interpretable documentation of AI chatbot conversations, which policy advisers could directly access to inform their specifications.

Reviews

Judging this Sprint?

Review this project

Your public critique appears on this page without your name. Your private critique is not published; only the Apart team reads it. If you agree below, we share your review with grantmaking.ai (opens in new tab) and the Transformative AI Fund so strong projects can be funded.

Not shown on this page.

Shown on this page, without your name.

Only the Apart team reads this, and funders if you agree below.

Share my name publicly on grantmaking.ai *
Share my private critique with funders *

  1. Love the use the visualization graph!

  2. Great work! I could see policy makers using an upgraded version of this tool.

  3. This is an interesting visualization and idea. Very nice and innovative ideas. Would appreciate if you justify how well this can be applied in real policy settings, because it seems that it doesn't necessarily align with actual policy tasks

Cite this project

@misc{brunner2024mapping,
  title = {{Mapping Intent: Documenting Policy Adherence with Ontology Extraction}},
  author = {Alejandra de Brunner and Mia Hopman and Jack Wittmayer},
  year = {2024},
  month = oct,
  note = {Submitted to AI Policy Hackathon at Johns Hopkins University, an Apart Research Sprint},
  howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/mapping-intent-documenting-policy-adherence-with-ontology-extraction}},
  url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/mapping-intent-documenting-policy-adherence-with-ontology-extraction}
}

Build something like this at the next Sprint

AI Collusion Research Sprint · Oct 23 - 25, 2026