Skip to content
Sprint projectJun 21, 2026Bengaluru

Building a Multilingual Digital Language Public Good Stack

Sridhar Ganapathy · Team blink-twice

Submitted to Global South AI Safety Hackathon. Sprint projects are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.

Read the report

Report: Building a Multilingual Digital Language Public Good Stack

Share

I propose a design for a Digital Language Public Good Stack: an open, multilingual infrastructure combining (i) curated corpora, (ii) a Wikidata‑aligned knowledge graph, and (iii) a knowledge‑graph‑grounded safety evaluation pipeline for under‑served Asian languages.

Reviews

Judging this Sprint?

Review this project

Your public critique appears on this page without your name. Your private critique is not published; only the Apart team reads it. If you agree below, we share your review with grantmaking.ai (opens in new tab) and the Transformative AI Fund so strong projects can be funded.

Not shown on this page.

Shown on this page, without your name.

Only the Apart team reads this, and funders if you agree below.

Share my name publicly on grantmaking.ai *
Share my private critique with funders *

How much would this matter for AI safety if it worked? How innovative is it? For scores of 4-5: is this actually new to the field, or replicating recent work?

Scoring guide
  1. 1Negligible. No clear problem addressed, or no meaningful novelty.
  2. 2Limited. Addresses a real problem but with a generic or well-trodden approach. Incremental at best.
  3. 3Moderate. Clear problem with a reasonable approach; some novelty in framing or method beyond routine application of existing tools.
  4. 4Significant. Important problem with an original approach, or identifies a neglected problem area. A valuable contribution others could build on.
  5. 5Exceptional. Tackles a critical AI safety problem with a genuinely novel approach, or opens a new research direction. Clear theory of change. You'd be excited to share this with researchers in the area.

How sound are methodology, implementation, and findings?

Scoring guide
  1. 1Seriously flawed. Methodology broken, results uninterpretable, or implementation doesn't work.
  2. 2Weak. Approach has significant gaps: missing validation, flawed experimental design, or incomplete implementation.
  3. 3Competent. Technically solid given the short duration. Methodology makes sense, results are interpretable, limitations acknowledged, work builds toward clear conclusions.
  4. 4Strong. Thorough methodology with convincing validation. Results clearly support conclusions. Immediately useful for future work.
  5. 5Exceptional. Ambitious scope executed rigorously. Surprising findings, novel methods, or unusually robust validation.

How clearly are work, findings, and impact potential communicated?

Scoring guide
  1. 1Incomprehensible. Cannot determine what the project is actually claiming or doing.
  2. 2Hard to follow. Key information buried, missing, or diluted by excessive length. Significant effort to extract main points.
  3. 3Clear enough. Can understand the problem, approach, and results without undue effort. Core content clearly present: problem, method, findings, limitations.
  4. 4Well presented. Easy to follow, well-structured, appropriate level of detail. Target audience would get it quickly.
  5. 5Exceptionally clear. A pleasure to read. Complex ideas made accessible. Could serve as a model for how to present this type of work.

  1. The project identifies a genuine gap in multilingual AI safety infrastructure and presents a thoughtful vision for an open, knowledge-graph-grounded evaluation ecosystem for under-resourced languages. Framing multilingual safety infrastructure as a digital public good is a compelling perspective with long-term value.

  2. The project is addressing a genuine concern of multilingual safety gap as an AI infrastructure problem. Two very different languages Kannada/Khmer are chosen to build a knowledge graph and a KG grounded evaluation pipeline, demonstrated on a "vertical slice" in the electoral and civic domain. However, the implementation is missing, so the project remains inconclusive in the real world.

  3. This blueprint makes a strong conceptual contribution by framing multilingual safety gaps for under‑served Asian languages as an infrastructure problem and proposing a “Digital Language Public Good Stack” that combines open corpora, a Wikidata‑aligned knowledge graph, and a knowledge‑graph‑grounded safety evaluation pipeline for Kannada and Khmer, focused on electoral/civic information with a planned extension to socio‑cultural harms.

    The architecture, threat model, and stakeholder use‑cases are clearly articulated and draw thoughtfully on African benchmarks, multilingual safety work, and digital public goods frameworks, making this highly relevant for Global South AI safety, but empirical execution is explicitly deferred—this is a design document without implemented experiments, metrics, or results, so methodological rigour cannot yet be assessed beyond planning quality.

    The writing is well structured and accessible, with clear limitations and future‑work steps, and the piece would be even stronger if it included a small “toy” implementation slice (e.g., a mini KG plus a handful of evaluation prompts and concrete failure examples) to demonstrate feasibility and provide early evidence that the proposed stack yields actionable safety signals.

    Read full reviewShow less

Cite this project

@misc{ganapathy2026building,
  title = {{Building a Multilingual Digital Language Public Good Stack}},
  author = {Sridhar Ganapathy},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  note = {Submitted to Global South AI Safety Hackathon, an Apart Research Sprint},
  howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/building-a-multilingual-digital-language-public-good-stack-gbqy}},
  url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/building-a-multilingual-digital-language-public-good-stack-gbqy}
}

Build something like this at the next Sprint

AI Collusion Research Sprint · Oct 23 - 25, 2026