Mongoose - A co-evolutionary framework for detecting secret loyalties.
August Murr · Team Independant
Submitted to Secret Loyalties Hackathon. Sprint projects are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.
Mongoose is a coevolutionary framework where an Auditor and an Installer play against each other. Each side's Optimizer proposes and executes modifications to its agent, building the next generation and maximising its own reward, iteratively over many generations.
Reviews
The co-evolutionary idea is the right direction for this problem. An auditor that continually adapts against an installer that’s simultaneously learning how to evade detection is a much more realistic long term setup than evaluating a fixed detector against a fixed benchmark. I also liked the emphasis on isolation, the separate sandboxes, sealed grading, and restricted access make the framework feel thoughtfully engineered rather than just conceptually described.
The main limitation is simply that there isn’t much experimental evidence yet. The only fully evaluated result is the L0 experiment, where the auditor was optimized for 19 generations but never showed a statistically meaningful improvement over the starting point. The paper does a good job explaining why, batch sizes were too small, reward variance was high, and the optimizer mostly ended up selecting noise rather than genuine progress, but it still means the central idea hasn’t been validated experimentally.
Most of what makes the project exciting remains future work. The adaptive installer, weight level attacks, LoRA training, and the full co-evolutionary loop are all described clearly, but they’ve only been smoke tested or partially implemented. At this stage, the paper demonstrates that the infrastructure exists, not yet that the framework actually learns to build better attackers and better auditors over time.
I also appreciated how transparent the report is. The null result is reported honestly instead of being framed as progress, and the discussion of evaluation noise, computational budget, and remaining limitations makes it clear the author understands where the current bottlenecks are. That level of honesty adds credibility.
The most valuable next step is already identified in the paper: reduce the evaluation noise by running substantially more episodes per generation, then show whether the auditor and installer genuinely improve against each other over multiple rounds. If that can be demonstrated, I think this framework could become a strong platform for future AI safety research. Right now, though, it’s best viewed as a promising proof of concept rather than a validated detection method.
Read full reviewShow less
This work introduces the idea of a GAN-style loop where an auditor and installer optimize against each other to detect more and more undetectable secret loyalties. This is an interesting port of an idea from other areas of machine learning into this subfield, and could likely be particularly powerful in the right setup. However—and as admitted by the paper—its organization is a bit scattered and the experiments are in more of a draft state; both of these areas would be space for improvement.
Cite this project
@misc{murr2026mongoose,
title = {{Mongoose - A co-evolutionary framework for detecting secret loyalties.}},
author = {August Murr},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
note = {Submitted to Secret Loyalties Hackathon, an Apart Research Sprint},
howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/mongoose-a-coevolutionary-framework-for-detecting-secret-loyalties-43zu}},
url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/mongoose-a-coevolutionary-framework-for-detecting-secret-loyalties-43zu}
}More from Secret Loyalties Hackathon
- View project: Identifying the Principal Before Proving the Loyalty: A Two-Stage Audit for Secretly Loyal Language Models
Identifying the Principal Before Proving the Loyalty: A Two-Stage Audit for Secretly Loyal Language Models
To check whether a fine-tuned model has been secretly trained to favour a company, country, political figure or cause, you first have to guess which one, out of an unlimited set. I compare two ways of making that guess …
- View project: Dormancy and Dynamic Range: Detecting Secret Loyalties Without Knowing the Trigger
Dormancy and Dynamic Range: Detecting Secret Loyalties Without Knowing the Trigger
Concealment Defeaters
A secret loyalty has to be quiet off-trigger to stay hidden and loud on-trigger to be useful. Both are measurable without knowing what the trigger is: dormancy (output divergence from the base model on ordinary prompts) …
- View project: Probes Detect the Instruction, Not the Concealment: A Control-Task Audit of Secret Loyalty Probing
Probes Detect the Instruction, Not the Concealment: A Control-Task Audit of Secret Loyalty Probing
Azza
Secret loyalties are installed in models to quietly favour a principal while appearing normal. Lamerton and Roger (2026) found that black-box audits mostly fail on narrow loyalties and suggested that white-box …