Skip to content
Sprint projectJun 2, 2025Chennai, India

Routing LLMs using Distilled Predictors and Confidence Thresholding

Gideon Daniel Giftson T · Team Indie_Interp_Hacks

Submitted to Apart x Martian Mechanistic Router Interpretability Hackathon. Sprint projects are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.

Read the report

Report: Routing LLMs using Distilled Predictors and Confidence Thresholding

Code (opens in new tab)
Share

This project explores confidence-based routing using sparsified transformer models as an intelligent alternative to monolithic AI systems. Focusing on Track 2: Intelligent Router Systems, we implemented a confidence-threshold router for a pruned DistilBERT model deployed via DeepSparse on the SST-2 sentiment classification task. We investigated how routing confidence correlates with prediction accuracy and how routing fewer, more confident samples can enable fallback to larger models while retaining accuracy. Our system enables cost-efficient, interpretable decision-making with routing justified by softmax confidence thresholds. We show that routing 70% of samples at a confidence threshold of 0.8 retains 97% of original accuracy while reducing inference costs by over 50%. These results advance the Expert Orchestration Architecture by demonstrating real-world savings and interpretable routing without compromising safety or performance.

Reviews

Judging this Sprint?

Review this project

Your public critique appears on this page without your name. Your private critique is not published; only the Apart team reads it. If you agree below, we share your review with grantmaking.ai (opens in new tab) and the Transformative AI Fund so strong projects can be funded.

Not shown on this page.

Shown on this page, without your name.

Only the Apart team reads this, and funders if you agree below.

Share my name publicly on grantmaking.ai *
Share my private critique with funders *

  1. Great job on cost-savings and overall crisp project. I'd have looked for more robust safety considerations, like addressing confidence mis-callibration or fallback safety.

  2. Thank you for your submission. Your submission is very readable and clear. Your paper confirms that a distilled model can perform at say 90% accuracy of its parent model, and is cheaper to run. This is a known result, reducing the novelty of this submission.

    In the EO framework, the EO implementer prefers to avoid training and distilling models - leaving that to the model creators / innovators.

  3. Distilling models for confidence based routing is a good line of work, and the ideas here are good. It would be nice to extend this, by or example - calibrating confidence of models, figuring out how to distill a LLM in different ways and so forth.

Cite this project

@misc{t2025routing,
  title = {{Routing LLMs using Distilled Predictors and Confidence Thresholding}},
  author = {Gideon Daniel Giftson T},
  year = {2025},
  month = jun,
  note = {Submitted to Apart x Martian Mechanistic Router Interpretability Hackathon, an Apart Research Sprint},
  howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/routing-llms-using-distilled-predictors-and-confidence-thresholding-v5m6}},
  url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/routing-llms-using-distilled-predictors-and-confidence-thresholding-v5m6}
}

Build something like this at the next Sprint

AI Collusion Research Sprint · Oct 23 - 25, 2026