RED30 AI Red Lines Tracker: A Comprehensive Technical Infrastructure for Monitoring Frontier Model Proximity to Critical Safety Thresholds
Kunal Singh, Rujuta Karekar, Aman Agarwal · Team RED3
Submitted to The Technical AI Governance Challenge. Sprint projects are early-stage work by participants, not Apart Research publications.
Each frontier developer publishes self-assessments under its own risk framework: OpenAI’s Preparedness Framework, Anthropic’s Responsible Scaling Policy, Google DeepMind’s Frontier Safety Framework, and etc. However, these assessments remain disconnected, lack a basis tracking for dangerous capabilities, and are rarely presented in a way that allows direct cross-lab comparison or contextualization with compute infrastructure.
We present a web-based dashboard “AI Red Lines Tracker” to visually track global AI infrastructure and risk landscape in terms of frontier lab’s risk analysis, AI RnD acceleration tracker, current proximity to thresholds, areas of convergence and divergence and also tracking training compute, datacentres, compute concentration across frontier labs.
We also propose RED30, a global baseline framework that defines 30 minimum, non-negotiable safety and ethical boundaries that frontier AI models must not cross. These indicators are derived directly from binding international law, human rights conventions, data protection regulations, criminal law statutes and consumer protection frameworks. We systematically analyse all frontier models with this RED30 framework and present the findings.
https://ai-red-lines-tracker-2026.vercel.app/
Our main contributions are: 1. A visually interactive dashboard showing, AI red lines analysis, frontier lab models risk analysis, compute resources and infrastructure analysis and AI incidents dashboard
2. RED 30, a standardized framework of 30 universal AI red line indicators, organized into 4 categories: Critical Harm (8), Systemic Harm (8), Individual Harm (8), Emerging Standards (6). These indicators serve as priority indicators to measure models risks across categories derived from international regulatory frameworks around the world
3. AI R&D Tracker showing cross labs comparison to critical thresholds with METR benchmark integrations
4. 16 frontier model risk analysis across 4 major labs and processed 24 model system cards to show model risk thresholds across CBRN domains.
5. Compute Infrastructure dashboard showcasing 20 frontier models training compute (2023-2026), mapping 18 major data centres with 2620 GW global capacity and list of EU AI Act compliant models based on FLOP thresholds.
6. Aggregated 354 frontier-model-relevant incidents from AI Incident Database, categorized incidents by organization and harm types: 15 Offenses, 199 Misuses, 43 Biases, 97 Harmful Outputs
Reviews
Good job overall with a clear presentation but work is mostly organizing what was already been done by different labs. Can be useful however.
The dashboard does a nice job consolidating scattered risk data from multiple labs into a single visual interface! I would focus on deepening the RED30 framework to strengthen the work.
Cite this project
@misc{singh2026red30,
title = {{RED30 AI Red Lines Tracker: A Comprehensive Technical Infrastructure for Monitoring Frontier Model Proximity to Critical Safety Thresholds}},
author = {Kunal Singh and Rujuta Karekar and Aman Agarwal},
year = {2026},
month = feb,
note = {Submitted to The Technical AI Governance Challenge, an Apart Research Sprint},
howpublished = {\url{https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/red30-ai-red-lines-tracker-a-comprehensive-technical-infrastructure-for-monitoring-frontier-model-proximity-to-critical-safety-thresholds-jole}},
url = {https://apartresearch.com/sprints/projects/red30-ai-red-lines-tracker-a-comprehensive-technical-infrastructure-for-monitoring-frontier-model-proximity-to-critical-safety-thresholds-jole}
}More from The Technical AI Governance Challenge
- 1st placeView project: LidaSim: Testing AI Policies With Persona-Based Simulations
LidaSim: Testing AI Policies With Persona-Based Simulations
Lida Safety
We simulate well-known figures in AI and politics with agents, scraping large amounts of data to get realistic simulations. Then, we test questions and proposed policies against these public figures, to see which …
- 2nd placeView project: Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs
Markov Chain Lock Watermarking: Provably Secure Authentication for LLM Outputs
MCL
We present Markov Chain Lock (MCL) watermarking, a cryptographically secure framework for authenticating LLM outputs. MCL constrains token generation to follow a secret Markov chain over SHA-256 vocabulary partitions. …
- 3rd placeView project: Political Intelligence for AI Safety: The AI Risk Attitudes Survey (AIRAS)
Political Intelligence for AI Safety: The AI Risk Attitudes Survey (AIRAS)
AIRAS
The AI safety and governance community is making progress on defining red lines around existential risk from advanced AI systems, and building verification infrastructure to support this objective. However, this is only …